That's the address of an article that's at the first page of the Boston Globe's website today.
There's no excuse for voyeurism or involuntary pornography; they are sickening, deliberate, vicious crimes that inflict a lifetime of chronic problems on their targets.
Also, most of the naked women and men in paintings and sculptures were probably sexually abused in one way or another. Most of them were probably impoverished; many of them probably were prostitutes. Many of them probably had sex with the artists for whom they modelled, either because they were raped or because they knew that they were expected to have sex or they wouldn't get paid. Art is as male-dominated as anything else in the world ever was.
It's a joke that men who like to film people naked call the products "art films"; they know it's a joke and so does the rest of the world. It's even more disgusting, although not surprising, that the misogynist and exploitative conglomerate has praised itself for its torture of me by calling the SICK, SADISTIC, ILLEGAL videos of me "art."
What the conglomerate is calling me is a stupid slut; that's what it wants the world to believe about me. It will shout over everything that I say by publishing another story about nudity and masturbation and showers and bathrooms, urine and defecation and menstruation and body hair, because its goal is to make me permanently degraded and ridiculed.
The beginning of the Boston Globe article is:
"If the pleasure you take in looking at erotic images is compromised at times by feelings of guilt, rest assured: Such feelings are nothing new."
It doesn't seem to me that the conglomerate feels guilty about abusing me; if it felt guilty, it would stop.
It's also very offensive when the conglomerate tries to construe my objections about being the chronic victim of conglomerate-promoted, criminal leering as female preoccupation with people critiquing my body. If someone vandalized your house, would you be mortified by what the criminal later told everyone about what he or she thought of the house, or would your anger be about the criminal bragging everywhere that he or she committed a crime against you and wasn't punished?
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, June 9, 2016 @ 9:53 a.m.
