Those are also pictures of part of the Columbia Journalism Review's report.
Isn't it probable that, after the Rolling Stone article was published, and Mr. Scipione realized that media sympathetic to the University of Virginia were attacking Ms. Erdely for supposedly not having given enough information to people like Mr. Scipione before the Rolling Stone article was published, Mr. Scipione knew to say in an interview that he hadn't gotten enough information from Ms. Erdely before the Rolling Stone article was published?
Also; has Mr. Scipione provided the date of another sexual assault that happened at Phi Kappa Psi, or did he lie about the "mid-September" assault so that it would seem to contradict the September 28, 2012 assault reported by Rolling Stone?
Other than that they are white men, have a lot of money and are related to or know powerful people, which I know are nearly omnipotent obstructions, why does anyone have trouble prosecuting people like this?
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, July 11, 2016 @ 3:31 a.m.