That's a picture of part of a Fox News article which was published today. This is the address for it:
"Unable to find anything" is not accurate reporting by Fox News.
Ms. Erdely's June 30, 2016 court filing says that Ms. Erdely found the name of someone who was a graduate student at the University of Virginia. The Rolling Stone article had reported that Drew was a junior at the University of Virginia in the fall of 2012, which means that he could have been a graduate student in the fall of 2014.
Is that graduate student the person whom the March 23, 2015 Charlottesville Police Department's statement identified as someone whose work schedule and financial records "may have been relevant" to Jackie having had dinner at the Boar's Head Inn on the night of September 28, 2012?
This is a picture from today of an ad for the Boar's Head Inn:
Is the fraternity that the graduate student whom Ms. Erdely found online also the fraternity that the Charlottesville Police Department's March 23, 2015 statement said the person whom the police questioned, with his lawyer present, was a member of in 2006?
These are pictures of consecutive parts of Ms. Erdely's June 30, 2016 court filing:
The Washington Post had led the media attacks on the Rolling Stone article, which had emboldened Phi Kappa Psi to publish a statement of denial. Probably, there was a lot of peer pressure among students at the University of Virginia as soon as the Post and other media began to attack the Rolling Stone article, and everyone who had contributed to the article was afraid of retribution at school and of being sued.
These are pictures of consecutive parts of the Charlottesville Police Department's March 23, 2015 statement, from a reprint of the statement by the Washington Post:
The Washington Post printed a copy of the police statement on March 23, 2015, the day that the statement was released by the Charlottesville Police Department. This is the address for that article:
The Lexus ads began to infiltrate the Washington Post's website a few days ago, after I wrote a page saying that people who falsely accuse other people of crimes can be criminally charged, and that Jackie is probably afraid because she's being called a liar by the media, Ms. Eramo and Ms. Erdely.
That's the address for the Propublica page called "ProPublica Wins Third Pulitzer Prize for 'An Unbelievable Story of Rape," from April 16, 2016.
The Pulitzer Prize is awarded by Columbia University. Once I had read "An Unbelievable Story of Rape," it seemed to me that giving the Pulitzer Prize to ProPublica might have been Columbia University's way of apologizing for discrediting the Rolling Stone article. Not that anyone who discredited the Rolling Stone article has apologized in so many words, unfortunately.
The ProPublica report is about a serial rapist. One of his victims was intimidated into retracting her story that she was raped, and she was criminally charged for it. As "unbelievable" as her story was, it was true.
Is the name that Rachel Soltis knew the name of one of the Phi Kappa Psi members who assaulted Jackie? Is he one of the three plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Rolling Stone that was dismissed in June of 2016?
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, October 23, 2016 @ 11:52 a.m./I'll publish my preliminary page and other pages again soon.