I have heard that they're very lucrative.
If Mr. Snowden were a spy, why would he want to return to the United States? Why would he have told the world who he was? Why would he have advocated for privacy and freedom for the citizens of every country?
What are the motivations for someone to be a spy:
-wanting to be affiliated with a country other than one's own
-money
-power
Mr. Snowden has requested to return to the United States for years. If he were a spy for Russia, why wouldn't he have fled directly and clandestinely to Russia and then lived the social and professional life of a rich traitor?
Why would he have criticized the Russian government?
Also, why does the author of this article think that Mr. Snowden not having exposed America's spy network was an act of treason?
From wuss to evil James Bond in a paragraph; that's quite a literary feat.
I have spent significant amounts of time since the conglomerate formed and began to persecute me in 2010 getting "unfavorable evaluation(s)." They are really disruptive to things such as having a place to live, employment, and a school to attend. So far, every one of them has had its impetus in abuse, my objecting to the abuse, and the lies of the abusers.
Today is not the first day that I have suggested that every police station be trained to deal with cyber issues, or that I have asked the questions "What if the only regulatory or disciplinary government organizations for crime prevention and reduction were at the federal or international level? Don't you think that the world would devolve into crime, starting at the local level and building until national and international crises erupted all over the world? Why are all the world's governments continuing to treat the Internet as if it's not a real place, when not only is it a real place, it is a real place that is infinite in scope?"
Chips implanted in people's brains at birth that read thoughts and deliver crippling pain to anyone who starts to think in a way that is not government-approved might eliminate the need for bureaucracy and even most of government. One or a few people could control the entire planet. If the author of the article is saying that much of our government is incompetent and wasteful, I don't disagree.
This is a quote that is not from the article:
Perhaps democracy would be less dysfunctional if it weren't as exploitable as it is to people whose main goals are inordinate wealth and power.
They didn't have enough recruits because our public schools have never had enough money and the government has never prioritized education. Education should be every country's first priority.
This is also not a quote from the article:
This is the address for the article:
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, January 20, 2017 @ 9:53 a.m./I'll publish my preliminary page and similar pages again soon, although I don't think it's illiteracy that prevents the conglomerate from reading them.
