Those are pictures from today of a New York Post article from January 12, 2016, called "Suspects claim teen was having sex with father before alleged gang rape."
Have you never heard of being afraid to say no?
Either the victim of this case was being sexually abused by her father, probably not for the first time, before the group of male teenagers assaulted her, or she wasn't. If she was, then what's happening after 6 years of sexual crime promotion by the conglomerate is that people who are already being abused by family members are at severe risk of being abused by people outside the family, who see that nobody is going to stop them from adding to the victimization of those who are already the victims of chronic abuse.
Those are also pictures of the January 12 New York Post article.
Isn't what the Post saying is that one of the male adolescents asked the woman's father, not her, for permission for the group to have sex with her? Isn't what the adolescent rapist who called the woman a "freak" before he and his friends raped her meant was that whatever was about to happen to her was her fault?
Also, if generations of women are being brainwashed by the conglomerate to think that women don't have the right to say no to sex, that is not an achievement for civil rights.
The first part of the article shows a picture of two of the suspects grinning. Are they excited because they think that not only will the charges against them be dropped, they'll also be turned into public heroes and paid millions of dollars from lawsuits, like the suspects for the 1989 gang rape of the Central Park jogger and quite possibly fraternity members who gang raped a female student at the University of Virginia in 2012?
Are cell phone videos of gang rapes going to be used from now on not only as trophies for the rapists that millions of people will see online, but also as media-and-court-approved evidence of the victims' guilt? "If you're going to rape someone, get it on tape so that everyone will see that the b---- is lying?" That's not a quote; it's a paraphrase of what I think is probably the attitude that the conglomerate is encouraging. What do you think that someone who knows that she's about to be raped no matter what she says is going to say? Do you think that if the rapists tell her to "smile for the camera," she won't?
That's the Web address for the New York Post article from January 12, 2016.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, January 16, 2016 @ 10:48 a.m.
