That's a picture from today of the section for the first article at the first page of the Boston Globe's website.
That's a picture from today of the section for the first article at the first page of the website for the New York Times.
That's a picture from today of the section for the first article at the first page of the Washington Post's website.
The conglomerate never stops alluding to masturbation. It alludes to it a lot more often than I talk about it, write about it or do it, but the conglomerate doesn't publish anything that talks about masturbation scientifically, culturally, psychologically, or in any way that contributes to society.
For a lot of people, masturbation is probably their main sexual activity, and that was probably always true of the human species, even before the Internet plastered pornography everywhere.
If the media wants to talk about masturbation, why doesn't the media do that intelligently, instead of treating me as if I deserve to live like a publicized freak for the rest of my life? I never consented to the SICK, SADISTIC, ILLEGAL videos of me that were filmed by hidden cameras, nor would I have consented to being filmed if I were asked. It is DISGUSTING that the conglomerate has treated me as if the EVIDENCE of the crime of voyeurism committed against me, which those videos are, is something for which to blame me instead of the people who illegally filmed me and the people who made those people think that it was something that I deserved.
It is also horribly offensive when I am approached by people who are alluding to masturbation in some way, as if they want me to know that they do it, too. I'm not an exhibitionist, and I'm not interested in your displays about your sex life.
The conglomerate routinely treats me as if I am someone whom other people have the right to approach with sexual familiarity, no matter who they are or how I feel about them. Nobody has that right.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, July 6, 2016 @ 12:46 p.m.
