Europe wants the United States to accept millions of refugees, while European corporations do business with Iran, one of Assad's allies?
Is that accurate to say?
Corporations act as if sanctions against dictators who have murdered hundreds of thousands of people and displaced millions of people, or sanctions against allies of those dictators, are nothing other than impediments to making money, while those corporations expect governments of countries all over the world to spend millions or billions of dollars taking care of the refugees displaced by those dictators?
The media doesn't want to lose advertising revenue, so it spends its time criminally invading my privacy, and probably the privacy of a lot of other people, rumor-mongering and promoting crime instead of talking about how much corporations don't care how many people die?
How many corporations that own media sources, or whose advertising funds media sources, are doing business with Iran?
Are all of the people listed in this article still doing business with Iran:
At this page, I have included the addresses of some Internet articles that I read.
Why is the media discussion in the United States almost entirely about whether or not it's racist to refuse refugees access to our country, and not about how to remove from power the person who created the refugee crisis, so that those people can safely return to a democratic Syria?
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, February 26, 2017 @ 6:53 p.m.
