What about Drew's financial records, which, like records that the University of Virginia refused to divulge, were described by the Charlottesville police department as records which "may have been relevant" to the case?
That's the address of what seems to be the only current article that's at the first page of results for a Google search of the term "uva rolling stone."
The first two paragraphs of the Daily Caller article are:
"The University of Virginia dean who is suing Rolling Stone for defamation has asked a federal judge to force the National Organization for Women (NOW) to turn over its correspondence with lawyers for the woman whose false rape claims are the centerpiece of the debunked article, 'A Rape on Campus.'
Attorneys for the dean, Nicole Eramo, allege that NOW, the largest feminist group in the U.S., and the lawyers for the false rape accuser, ('Jackie'), engaged in a publicity stunt by jointly crafting a Jan. 6, 2016 open letter criticizing Eramo for 'revictimiz[ing]' the fabulist."
The author of the Daily Caller article uses Jackie's name, which I omitted from the quote.
I have mentioned this before; isn't it possible that Jackie's first and last names were part of the reason that she was targeted for sexual assault? Was she raped in effigy of me?
That's the address of a Tweet that Chuck Ross, the author of the Daily Caller article, retweeted yesterday.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, June 12, 2016 @ 5:40 p.m.
