March 31, 2016
People who think that the conglomerate ever cared about that have not understood what the conglomerate's real goals are, during these six years of the conglomerate's promotion of sexual abuse.
Thursday, March 31, 2016
The conglomerate DOES NOT CARE if women and children get raped and killed.
"bludgeoned, raped, sodomized, beaten"
March 31, 2016
"Her body temperature is eighty-five degrees, and she is unable to breathe on her own...The woman is bleeding from five deep cuts across her forehead and scalp; patients who lose this much blood are generally dead. Her skull has been fractured, and her eye will later have to be put back in its place...The victim's arms and legs are flailing violently, the aftereffects of massive brain damage...both halves of her brain have lost their ability to control the movement of her extremities, to say nothing of her ability to think or feel...There is extreme swelling of the brain caused by the blows to the head."
Those are quotes from the book "I Am the Central Park Jogger," taken from an online article from 2003, for which this is the address:
The people who did this to her were released from prison, apologized to, and awarded millions of dollars.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 31, 2016 @ 8:12 p.m.
THE CONGLOMERATE HAS READ ALL OF MY POLICIES BEFORE!
March 31, 2016
I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO PUBLISH THEM EVERY DAY!
The conglomerate takes more than enough of my time without my having to republish every feeble defense that I have against its rapacious behavior every day!
Copyright L. Kochman, March 31, 2016 @ 10:25 a.m.
I was a good student in high school and in college.
March 31, 2016
I also did activities such as sports, drama and music.
I never did anything like raping someone, but the conglomerate never seems to think that anything other than my being a bad person caused my adult life not to be what I had wanted it to be.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 31, 2016 @ 9:28 a.m.
The Washington Post's definition of reporting both sides of a story
March 31, 2016
The Washington Post's March 31, 2016 article about the conviction of a Stanford student for sexual assault has paragraphs and paragraphs about the rapist's athletic achievements, the future which he could have had which is being taken from him because of the conviction, and the opinions of anonymous people whom the writer of the article identifies as "one man on a local TV station's coverage of the verdict," and "commentators."
The article was written by someone whose last name is Miller. Miller is conglomerate code for the promotion of child molestation.
There's a Tweet in the article attributed to someone who has a screen name that ends with the number "7." 7 is conglomerate code for the promotion of child molestation.
There's no discussion of how you're affected for the rest of your life by the trauma of being sexually assaulted. If the victim has spent entire days weeping or emotionally incapacitated, what her family and friends have suffered because of her pain, and how their future was irrevocably changed for the worse because of the rape, Mr. Miller doesn't seem to know or care to know.
Rape charges are often dismissed because the police say that there were no witnesses to objectively describe what happened. There were objective witnesses for this case, who saw the rape because they were biking and they accidentally saw it happen. They did not know the victim. They did not know the perpetrator. They clearly described what they saw. The perpetrator tried to run away when he realized that there were witnesses to what he was doing; those witnesses stopped him and are the reason that he was arrested. The Washington Post has failed to call those witnesses heroes or to suggest that THE RAPIST AND HIS BEHAVIOR are what have caused the disruption of the future of his academic, athletic and professional careers.
There are a lot of men who don't rape people when they're drunk. Those who do can't use alcohol as an excuse. How does Raping Under The Influence get used as a Get Out Of Jail Free card? Is someone trying to say that cars should have more rights than women?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 31, 2016 @ 9:24 a.m.
The New York Times
March 31, 2016
The New York Times is promoting misogyny and child molestation at the first page of its website today.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 31, 2016 @ 8:23 a.m.
The Boston Globe, "Innovation Economy," and promotion of rape
March 31, 2016
Yesterday, I published pages about the rape of the Central Park Jogger.
There was a movie called "The Central Park Five" released in 2012, whose premise was that the subjects of the movie were wrongly convicted of raping the Central Park Jogger.
The $40 million settlement decision in favor of the rapists was in 2014.
The conglomerate, including the Boston Globe, began promoting sexual abuse in 2010.
Today, the first page of the Boston Globe's website has a picture of five black and/or Hispanic men dressed like gangsters, picture credited to "Jaimie Trueblood/Universal Pictures," caption "Making movies the 'Moneyball Way,'" written by Scott Kirsner for "Innovation Econony."
"Innovation" is conglomerate code for child molestation.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 31, 2016 @ 8:18 a.m./addition @ 9:11 a.m.
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
March 30, 2016
March 30, 2016
"A sexual assault was reported to the Office of the Dean of Students on March 30, 2016 at 2:53 a.m. The reported assault occurred on March 27, 2016..."
That's a quote from the University of Virginia's Police Department's "Safety Announcements" page at its website, for which this is the address:
Three days before reporting. Hopefully, it's not too late to gather evidence and prosecute.
What do you think might have caused her hesitation to report the crime?
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 7:51 p.m.
The Rolling Stone article is about the fear that victims of rape have about reporting what has happened to them.
March 30, 2016
"In her meeting with Dean Eramo, 'Jackie' indicated that there were two other sexual asaults that had taken place in 2010 and 2014 at the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house. No victims have reported those incidents to the Charlottesville Police Department, nor have any witnesses come forward to report such an incident."
That's a quote from the Charlottesville Police Department's March 23, 2015 statement.
That's the address for a Washington Post article that says it has the full text of the statement.
The Rolling Stone article said that Jackie had told Dean Eramo that two other female students were gang rape victims of Phi Kappa Psi. The article said that those victims were contacted by Rolling Stone and they decided not to be interviewed for the article.
Was the Charlottesville Police Department's mention of those two other victims the result of a meeting that investigators from that police department were also part of, or was that section of the statement just something from the article that the police department mentioned to refute the entire article, ignoring everything else in the article about the University of Virginia's systemic failure to prevent rape or to help get rapists arrested and prosecuted?
Has someone tried to say that the two women who told Jackie that they were gang raped at the Phi Kappa Psi house were liars? Has someone tried to say that Jackie lied about them being raped, that she randomly and falsely identified two women to Rolling Stone? Why would she do that? Wouldn't anyone who was never raped and who was contacted by a journalist who was doing a story about rape be shocked by the request to be interviewed, and wouldn't that reaction have cast doubt on Jackie's account of her own assault? Where did Jackie get the names for Ms. Erdely to contact, if those Phi Kappa Psi gang rape stories weren't true?
This is a quote about those victims, from the Rolling Stone article:
"One, she says, is a 2013 graduate, who'd told Jackie that she'd been gang-raped as a freshman at the Phi Psi house. The other was a first-year whose worried friends had called Jackie after the girl had come home wearing no pants. Jackie said the girl told her she'd been assaulted by four men in a Phi Psi bathroom while a fifth watched. (Neither woman was willing to talk to RS.)"
Jackie lied about all of that? That's a lot of people to lie about, isn't it? A group of friends who told her that their friend had no pants on when she got home, who then told Jackie that four men raped her while a fifth watched? Jackie thought of that specific lie? Anyone would know that her own rapists would refute her story; even someone who lies about being raped knows that the people whom she falsely accuses will lie to defend themselves, and that they and their friends will be hostile toward her. Why would someone risk alienating a group of people by telling lies about someone else being raped, knowing that the entire group of friends of the person whom she's lying about would refute the lie?
It would seem that there are a lot of people who could be contacted about information from the Rolling Stone article. Has anyone done that?
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 7:41 p.m.
A trial date has been set for Phi Kappa Psi's $25 million lawsuit against Rolling Stone, Sabrina Erdely and Wenner Media.
March 30, 2016
That's according to the article for which this is the address:
That article also says:
"A Charlottesville Police Department investigation revealed that no such incident ever occurred at the frat."
That's incorrect. The Charlottesville Police Department's statement was inconclusive.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 6:40 p.m.
"this is my first rape"
March 30, 2016
It's another confession quote by one of the rapists.
That's the address of an article that has an excerpt from the book called "I Am the Central Park Jogger."
The excerpt also describes what the injuries to the victim of that rapist's "first rape" were.
The only reason that she lived and was able to physically recover as much as she has was that her medical bills were paid by her employer. Race and wealth played a part in this white victim's recovery. That does not mean that racism convicted her attackers.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 6:27 p.m.
"Shut up, bitch."
March 30, 2016
The title of this page is a quote from a videotaped confession of one of the adolescent defendants in the trial for rape and attempted murder of the Central Park jogger, as reported by the Los Angeles Times in 1990.
That's the address of the article.
The defendant was describing something that another participant in the rape said to the victim before the victim was hit with a brick.
More than one defendant also talked about the victim being hit with a metal pipe, in videotaped confessions.
The defense lawyers tried to convince the jury that the confessions were coerced. However, what strikes me about the confessions is how specific they are.
To say that you and your friends raped and hit someone is not the same thing as saying how you and your friends did those things. Did the defense lawyers try to convince the jury that police officers wrote a script for the suspects to read for the camera, that police told the suspects to add details like the victim being told to "shut up, bitch" before being hit with a brick to make her stop screaming or crying?
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 6:02 p.m.
"Several sets of handprints"
March 30, 2016
The title of this page is part of a quote from this article:
This is the Web address of a 2002 article about the rape and beating of the Central Park jogger:
"head and pubic hair found on one of the teenager's clothes matched the jogger."
"Prosecutors have always said more than 30 youths were involved in a string of attacks that night on several people in the park, which the teenagers called 'wilding.' They said that as many as 12 took part in the rape and assault of the jogger, who was left for dead. Doctors did not initially expect her to survive."
Those are quotes from that article.
The webpage that corresponds with that address also has an ad on it for a business called "SAS" that says "7 ways to valuable customer data."
The article is about the 2014 $40 million dollar settlement to the Central Park jogger rapists, 4 years after the conglomerate began to promote sexual abuse.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 5:35 p.m.
3VK 698
March 30, 2016
That is the license plate of a car that is at the intersection in front of On The Rise.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 3:27 p.m.
There's a car, license plate 9779, parked almost in front of Cambridge City Hall.
March 30, 2016
7 is conglomerate code for the promotion of child molestation.
9 is conglomerate code for promotion of voyeurism and involuntary pornography.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 3:24 p.m.
The government should stop producing license plates that promote crime.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 3:19 p.m.
Three of Jackie's rapists have admitted that they raped her.
March 30, 2016
They filed a lawsuit because Jackie's description of them and the room at the fraternity house where she was raped was so accurate that their friends and family knew who they were from the Rolling Stone article, even though neither their names nor pseudonyms for them were ever mentioned by the article.
She was a first-year student during her first semester when she was raped. Everyone who raped her denied even knowing who she was, saying that they had never met her. How, then, was she able to provide that description to Rolling Stone?
That lawsuit is an admission of the rapists' guilt, rapists who are both admitting to their crime and expecting to be treated as if they are the ones who got victimized because the person whom they raped told someone what they did.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 4:58 p.m.
The Washington Post continues its attacks on Rolling Stone, Sabrina Erdely and Jackie.
March 30, 2016
That's the address of yet another article by T. Rees Shapiro, an "Education Reporter" not a crime reporter, as described by The Washington Post. Mr. Shapiro graduated from a private high school in Virginia and then from Virginia Tech. Why has the Washington Post continued to publish articles that he writes about the University of Virginia, when there is every reason to believe that he is biased?
His articles have been full of factual errors, for which neither he nor the Washington Post have taken any responsibility. The Washington Post was and continues to be instrumental in the erroneous, public discrediting of the Rolling Stone article about rape at the University of Virginia.
The Washington Post has also frequently hacked my phone and my email, and has promoted sexual abuse.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 2:57 p.m.
The criminal justice system ought to change.
March 30, 2016
However the criminal justice system changes, it should not change to make sexual abuse legal.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 2:44 p.m.
Two janitors with brooms and dustpans just walked past me at the next train station.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 2:40 p.m.
I just got coughed at by someone working at a train station.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 2:28 p.m.
My landlord has ads on the sides of public buses, talking about "coming home."
March 30, 2016
The ads starting getting put on public buses after I got approved for my apartment through the Cambridge Inclusionary Zoning Program. That program is part of the city government of Cambridge, which takes applications and sends those which it approves to landlords who then approve or reject tenants. I did not choose the building; what I did was accept the apartment when my application was approved by the landlord, based on my credit.
Everybody in the building got an email on March 14, 2016, subject "Happy Pi Day!"
It said "In honor of Pi Day, we will be serving pies at (the building) beginning at 3:00 today. We look forward to seeing all of our residents!"
Everybody in the building also got an email on March 29, 2016, that said "come see what's on tap!"
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 2:26 p.m.
I don't choose excerpts or supporting information for code purposes; the conglomerate does.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 2:11 p.m.
The Jimmy Fund and the Boston Red Sox: "make their baseball dreams come true."
March 30, 2016
That's the address of a page at the Jimmy Fund's website.
Part of the title of my blog page about this is a quote from the webpage that corresponds with that address.
One of the most horrible things that the conglomerate does is make children who have health problems vulnerable to sexual abuse.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 30, 2016 @ 12:07 p.m.
Tuesday, March 29, 2016
I have gotten too many abusive messages at YouTube today to document them.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 8:46 p.m.
How did a bunch of videos that I published today at YouTube get listed as "Private," so that nobody saw them?
March 29, 2016
I did not set the settings that way. Why would I publish videos at YouTube if it weren't for people to watch and listen to them?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 8:38 p.m.
Are there hidden cameras in the restrooms at Bunker Hill Community College?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 1:08 p.m.
Harassment and intimidation attempts by MIT
March 29, 2016
MIT has launched a campaign to prevent me from getting to know anyone in Cambridge. It will probably harass any MIT graduate student or employee who talked to me and expel or fire anyone who got to know me. Its janitors and police officers have stalked me, and probably many of its female students and employees, and possibly even child and young adolescent participants of its programs, for years.
Since I published a page saying that Cambridge is supposed to be the land of brilliant people and talking about the chance of meeting people while living there, MIT has started putting hostile ads around Cambridge and on the public trains.
That's the address for the pages of results for a Google search from today of the term "sexism at MIT."
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 1:03 p.m.
The New York Times and other media sources have reported about Apple's "concern for privacy" as if those media sources, the government, many corporations and a lot of individual people aren't hacking my phone and publicizing their ridicule of me for their interpretations of the information which they illegally obtain!
March 29, 2016
They could do this to anyone. Nobody should believe that he or she has any electronic privacy.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 12:50 p.m.
The conglomerate has perpetuated a horrible and false image of me to the world for more than 6 years.
March 29, 2016
NOTHING that the conglomerate accuses me of or has ever tried to make anyone believe I'm going to do is ever true.
When is it going to stop?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 12:14 p.m.
It's time to sweep in the Emergency Room at Boston Medical Center, according to a man with a broom who just followed me into it.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 11:46 a.m.
The New York Times is making visual jokes about pubic hair a priority today.
March 29, 2016
Not the Zika virus.
Not HIV or AIDS.
Not world starvation.
Not even pollution.
Pubic hair.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 11:22 a.m.
There's a Wet Floor sign outside the restrooms at the Healthcare for the Homeless building.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 10:41 a.m.
There's a Wet Floor sign at the front desk at the Healthcare for the Homeless building, where I have a dental appointment today.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 10:38 a.m.
It is unbelievable that the Boston Globe is encouraging my landlord to mistreat me.
March 29, 2016
It's a female writer who's doing it today. Probably, women who refuse to be degraded or to degrade other women or to promote crime can't get hired by the Boston Globe and a lot of other media sources.
Does the Boston Globe want me to be homeless? Does it want me to be unemployed? Does it want me to be forced to stop my education?
If I get evicted again, I will lose my housing voucher. It won't be a question of my being homeless for ANOTHER TWO YEARS and then getting another apartment which the conglomerate will also try to make me lose; it will mean being homeless with no prospect of the homelessness ending.
Why does the Boston Globe or anyone else think that the conglomerate or its goals are supportive of women's rights?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 9:53 a.m.
I don't want to be famous. I want the abuses to stop.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 7:48 a.m.
I also have no obligation to provide a specific list of all the other people whom I'll never date.
March 29, 2016
If I had wanted to date any of these people, I COULD HAVE ALREADY DONE THAT!
Also, if I did want to do that, which I could and don't, IT WOULD NOT BE A CRIME! The conglomerate is a criminal that treats me like I'm the criminal.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 7:44 a.m./edited, with additions @ 8:44 a.m.
Ben Affleck & Jennifer Garner
March 29, 2016
Much of your behavior is reprehensible. At no time do I ever think or ever suggest that I think that's not true, nor have I ever thought or suggested that it isn't.
I hope that you'll mature eventually, and although you doing that doesn't seem imminent, your behavior that is unworthy of you is not something that makes me want you or your family to have the trauma of a divorce.
I'm writing this page because the New York Times, and probably a lot of other organizations and individual people, are lying about me again. I want you to know that my feelings haven't changed about anything, and they're not going to change. I'm not interested in dating Ben Affleck, and I never will be.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 7:40 a.m./edited, with additions @ 9:11 a.m.
The New York Times
March 29, 2016
The things that you have about me on the first page of your website are unbelievably horrible.
You are THE NEW YORK TIMES, one of the most respected newspapers in the world. You hacked my phone and are showing that you criminally invaded my privacy that way, while you're calling me a "Selfie Rat" and a "Hoax," in the same insult, and that's not everything that you're doing to be sickeningly dishonest and offensive.
I can't publish pictures of what you're doing because this blog was disabled from publishing pictures several weeks ago, while I was publishing pages about rape at the University of Virginia.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 7:28 a.m.
Monday, March 28, 2016
Law enforcement, please arrest anyone who hacks my phone or email or who criminally invades my privacy in other ways.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 2:03 a.m.
Somebody hacked my phone and email and made a movie from something that I wrote to someone.
March 29, 2016
I have no privacy at all.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2016 @ 2:02 a.m.
Suddenly, at almost quarter after 10 at night, a janitor has decided that it's time to paint in the lobby of the grocery store, and to put Wet Paint signs around.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 10:14 p.m.
A man just walked up behind me and coughed.
March 28, 2016
I said to him "You are the third man who has coughed at me." I'm not sure that he was, though; I think he might have been the man who had already just coughed at me.
He said "I wasn't coughing at you; I was just clearing my throat."
I said "Uh huh."
Then he said "You're not in my way or anything," which I assured him I hadn't been worried about being.
Then his girlfriend walked over to him and they stood there looking confusedly at the food that he had walked over to pretend to look at, before they finally left me alone and went to the cash registers.
There is no mention of the Brussels attack, or any terrorist attack, at the first page of the White House's official website today.
March 28, 2016
Stopping terrorism does not seem to be a priority for President Obama. Promoting sexual abuse does; no matter what else is happening anywhere in the world, the White House promotes sexual abuse every day.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 9:01 p.m.
President Obama is an obscene person.
March 28, 2016
I don't know if anyone does anything at the White House except to think of obscene things to publish at the White House's official website.
Every year, President Obama exploits Easter to make a sick joke of reading "Where the Wild Things Are" to children.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 8:51 p.m.
The murder of Nicole Lovell wasn't enough for the conglomerate to stop promoting child abuse?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 8:40 p.m.
I have a lot of schoolwork to do today, and I'm also supposed to start work-study this week, which I didn't have time to do before I got my apartment, because homelessness took too much of my time.
March 28, 2016
I don't need abuse from the conglomerate this week. I didn't need the abuse last week or the week before that or last year or every day of the past 6 years, either.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 1:52 p.m.
Robert Pattinson
March 28, 2016
You have nothing better to do than to try to perpetuate rumors about me. Really?
The person whom you and a number of other people are perpetuating rumors about has started to harass me in class, probably to try to dispel the rumors. He is not the person who harasses me the most, but he's started to be friends with that person, who has harassed me off and on since the start of the semester.
I haven't done anything to deserve any of this. I have not behaved inappropriately toward the people who are harassing me in that class or toward anyone else at my school. Also, harassment is NEVER appropriate.
Don't you have millions of dollars? Can't you think of something better to do with your time than to try to ruin every work, housing and educational opportunity that I try to obtain?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 1:46 p.m.
"u know no one wants to see ur ugly face stop this sexist bullshit"
March 28, 2016
That's a message that someone sent to one of my past YouTube blogs, "Lena Kochman Boston," 19 hours ago at the time that I'm publishing this page.
"Ugly cunt" was a message added to the same video 7 hours later, by someone else.
That follows the pattern of online bullying that I have seen before. One person says something derogatory, and other people, while they often have their own ideas about derogatory things to say, frequently also incorporate the derogatory things that someone or several people have already said in their messages.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 9:14 a.m.
Journalistic failure
March 28, 2016
It is journalistic failure when the media distorts a news story to be about something other than what the story is ostensibly about. It is also journalistic failure when the media commits or promotes crime.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 8:51 a.m.
The Boston Globe
March 28, 2016
Stop calling me a con artist. You hack my phone. Who knows how many other people's phones you hack or have victimized that way or in other ways? You commit and promote crime every day.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 28, 2016 @ 8:49 a.m.
Sunday, March 27, 2016
Is there someone, or are there several people, whom Drew raped in or before 2006, who signed legally binding documents, promising never to talk about it?
March 27, 2016
Is that what happened, or are there people whom he raped or in whose rapes he participated, who aren't talking about what happened to them because the Rolling Stone article was discredited, because of the lawsuits against Rolling Stone and Ms. Erdely, and because of Jackie being publicly condemned?
It seems as if Drew and several other fraternity members quickly got private lawyers, while it took Jackie some time to obtain private counsel, at who knows what cost to her and her parents.
She trusted everyone: Drew, her friends, fraternities, the University of Virginia, T. Rees Shaprio. What sort of liar trusts everyone?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 27, 2016 @ 5:34 p.m.
Apple's ads continue to block windows at the Pine Street Inn and to threaten people whom I knew years ago.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 27, 2016 @ 2:54 p.m.
GAY R90
March 27, 2016
That's the license plate of a car that is being driven by someone a few blocks from where I live. It looks like a Florida license plate.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 27, 2016 @ 2:08 p.m.
I am grateful that the paparazzi don't seem to stalk me and aren't publishing pictures of me.
March 27, 2016
I'm not sure why they respect my need for privacy when they don't have that respect for other famous or getting-to-be famous people, but I appreciate it. Maybe they realize that my life is awful and there's not much of me that they could get pictures of that the world won't be seeing because of the SICK, SADISTIC, ILLEGAL videos.
Copyright L. Kochman March 27, 2016 @ 1:47 p.m.
Whom did Drew take to dinner on September 28, 2012?
March 27, 2016
If Jackie wasn't the person whom Drew took to dinner at the Boar's Head Inn on the night that Jackie says she was later raped, who was? Is there someone who has told the police or anyone else that he or she was the person whom he took to dinner, a meal which the Charlottesville police statement of March 23, 2015 said was corroborated by Drew's financial records?
This is some of what the statement said about Drew, the "male subject" of the following paragraph:
"Another male subject was identified during the course of our investigation. This subject was both a member of a fraternity (not Phi Kappa Psi) and worked at the Aquatic and Fitness Center at the same time as Jackie. This individual cooperated fully with investigators in the presence of legal counsel to include providing copies of his work schedule and financial records which may have been relevant to a dinner date that 'Jackie' had with her alleged offender at the Boars Head Inn on the evening of September 28, 2012.
Investigators turned their attention to the fraternity house in which this subject was a member in 2006."
That's a quote from the March 23, 2015 statement which the Charlottesville Police Department had published at its website for a while.
In other words, the person who facilitated Jackie's rape, and her rapists, got all of their legal rights respected by the Charlottesville police. Unlike Jackie, they were treated not only respectfully but even deferentially. Everything that they said was accepted at face value by the police, even when it contradicted evidence that they were lying. The police made strenuous efforts to support the criminals' lies and even more strenuous efforts to discredit Jackie and make her look like a liar.
Why did the police investigate the fraternity house where Drew was a member in 2006? What about the discussion that they had with him, "in the presence of legal counsel," caused them to think that they should ask some questions about him at that fraternity, in spite of their wanting nothing more than to forget the entire situation so that they wouldn't get their careers destroyed by the University of Virginia's network of powerful alumni and the rape-promoting conglomerate media?
"They were provided the names of (six) 6 members who were living at the house at the time of this alleged incident; five (5) of the six (6) provided interviews. None of them knew 'Jackie,' admitted to any involvement in a sexual assault having occurred on September 28, 2012, nor did they see or hear anything about a sexual assault occurring in the fraternity at the time they lived there.
Investigation revealed that on September 28, 2012, this fraternity had a cook out for prospective members, and a themed event on September 29, 2012. Both of these functions were listed on the social calendar."
Did the police talk to anyone who was a 2006 member and resident of the fraternity of which Drew was a member in 2006? Did they ask him or anyone else why he was a UVA student and a fraternity member in 2006 and then seemed to have left the university and then matriculated again, 6 years later?
Drew's disappearance and reappearance at the University of Virginia, 6 years apart, are consistent with the University of Virginia's approach to serial rapists, which is neither to expel them nor assist with their arrest or prosecution. If the University takes any disciplinary action at all, the most that it does is ask a student to leave or suspend him for a while; then he's back to school as if the felony or felonies that he committed never happened.
Throughout the police statement, the failure of the police to find someone named "Drew" is presented several times, as if it is evidence that the Rolling Stone article has no factual basis. "Drew" is a pseudonym; neither Jackie nor Sabrina Erdely nor Rolling Stone nor anyone else ever said that "Drew" is the real name of that person. The police found the person who lured Jackie to be gang raped anyway, probably because it's obvious who he is and a lot of people who are or were at that school know what happened, even though they're not talking now.
"In addition, federal laws governing privacy and protection of certain records in the possession of academic institutions obstructed our ability to access records that may have been relevant to our investigation."
That sentence is almost at the beginning of the police statement. It is presented as if the records to which the police are trying to say that they could not get access are records pertaining to Jackie and not Drew, as if there's all sorts of evidence that Jackie is lying and that the University of Virginia is protecting her privacy. However, the language that the police used for that sentence is identical to the way that the police described Drew's work and financial records. It seems at least possible to me that the records at UVA (and other schools?) which the police made no effort to obtain were about Drew and/or Phi Kappa Psi and other fraternities and the school(s)' coddling of rapists, and that what the records "may have been relevant" to were Drew's habit of raping and facilitating the rape of female students and the systematic, institutional subterfuge about his crimes and others like them.
The police got a lot of records from the University of Virginia about Jackie. This is a quote from the statement about some of those records:
"redacted copies of documents that reflect Dean Eramo's previous meetings with 'Jackie'; specifically those documents referencing the sexual assault, physical assault, and an anonymous sexual assault report.
None of the documents we were given or had access to revealed any facts similar to what was disclosed in the Rolling Stone article."
"Redacted" means that things were taken out.
Although I took some pictures of the March 23, 2015 statement about the Charlottesville Police Department's investigation when it was published at the Department's website, this blog was suddenly disabled from publishing pictures from my phone several weeks ago, when I was publishing pages about rape at the University of Virginia. The blog was removed from the Internet, not by me, soon after it was disabled from publishing pictures. Although the blog was restored to the Internet, its ability to publish pictures wasn't.
This is the address of a Washington Post article that says it has the text of the police statement:
Why did the Washington Post or anyone else think that the Charlottesville police statement was a definitive disproval of Jackie's alleged rape? Even the police department didn't say that it was sure that Jackie wasn't sexually assaulted. This is a quote from the 'Conclusion' section of the statement:
"The department's investigation cannot rule out that something may have happened to 'Jackie' somewhere and at some time on the evening of September 28, 2012."
What was it about meeting with police in the presence of people who work for the University of Virginia that did not help Jackie feel that she could talk to the police about what had happened to her or say that she wanted the police to investigate? Also, did all of the police officers who had contact with Jackie or who read documents provided by the University of Virginia respond the way that the investigator responded to the picture of Jackie's bruised face, from an incident in which she was stalked, harassed and attacked for talking about being raped, by denying that the injury she described was verified by the evidence that she tried to present?
The protection of rapists and the discrediting of their victims by colleges, universities and other institutions are documented by a lot of people other than Ms. Erdely and Rolling Stone. That rape culture is particularly prevalent at the University of Virginia is also documented by a lot of people other than Ms. Erdely and Rolling Stone.
Although the police statement claims at its beginning that "investigators were never afforded the opportunity to interview 'Jackie,'" it then describes several instances in which Jackie spoke to the police. If Jackie finally got the feeling that talking to the police was not helping her, then her decision to stop talking to the police was her right, as it was always her right not to talk to the police at all. She didn't rape anybody.
What does "cooperating fully" mean, according to the Charlottesville police? Does it mean not saying anything that the police don't want to hear? Does it mean being the rapist who's lying instead of the rape victim who's telling the truth?
Jackie was often afraid to talk about what has happened to her. Does anyone blame her for being afraid?
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 27, 2016 @ 5:12 p.m.
Saturday, March 26, 2016
Did Newsweek think this was funny?
March 26, 2016
I have noticed that Newsweek has aggressively sought to expand the scope of the discrediting of the Rolling Stone article and Ms. Erdely. Newsweek is frequently mentioned in ongoing articles about the repercussions of the attacks on the Rolling Stone article and that journalist.
It seems to me that the promotion of rape culture and the discrediting of rape victims and those who try to help them are Newsweek's motivations.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, March 27, 2016 @ 12:06 a.m.
Columbia Journalism Review
March 26, 2016
Don't hack my phone.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 26, 2016 @ 11:53 p.m.
The destruction of a reporter's career; the destruction of the convictions of criminals.
March 26, 2016
You can get someone to say anything to get a criminal out of jail and to discredit the victims of sexual abuse.
There's no acknowledgement in the article, for which I have provided the address at this page, that the abuse could have caused the victim's adult problems.
The Washington Post is not acknowledging the mistakes that it made discrediting the Rolling Stone article about rape at the University of Virginia. What the Washington Post is doing tonight is promoting stalking by delivery people and exploiting an elderly woman to promote voyeurism and involuntary pornography.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 26, 2016 @ 11:51 p.m.
The conglomerate has never cared whether or not Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck get divorced.
March 26, 2016
All it cares about is accusing me of something, to try to excuse its behavior toward me and its promotion of human rights abuses.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 26, 2016 @ 10:57 p.m.
I don't think there are greeting cards that say "Please don't leave your wife for me; I won't go out with you ever in your life no matter what you do."
March 26, 2016
It would help if there were.
Since there aren't:
I'm mostly Jewish, which doesn't preclude my liking the quote for which that is the address.
Wounds heal if you let them. You have to forgive yourself and the other person; I don't think there's another way.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Lkochman, March 26, 2016 @ 7:00 p.m.
Why I hate Jennifer Lopez
March 26, 2016
I would not be surprised if she sat there in envy throughout every year that Ben Affleck's marriage to Jennifer Garner seemed happy and stable, not because she really wanted him back but because he seemed happy and stable. Then, when Ms. Lopez heard that he had a crush on me, she hated that, not because she loves him but because if he were going to be painfully divided about another woman, she didn't want it to be someone other than her, and THAT wasn't because she loves him, it is because she is the sort of person who HATES it when she's anywhere on the planet and someone else has attention when she doesn't.
Then, when his movie won a lot of awards, that was it. As far as she was concerned, I needed to be somehow erased from the planet, or hated by every living thing, and THAT was because he was suddenly IMPORTANT, and that made his crush on me IMPORTANT, which meant that it was IMPORTANT that his crush wasn't on her.
I scream. I yell. I truly hate Ben Affleck many days out of the week. The way that he and his friends have treated me is unbelievably horrible. However, I also know that I am not the only person who was ever part of his life in some way, and I'd like to think that I'm able to feel something other than my own rage about how he's treated me when I'm thinking about the situation of him, his wife, his family and his career.
I am SO TIRED of all the women doing interviews whose purpose is to make sure that Mr. Affleck knows that before he's done signing his divorce papers, they're clearing their calendars for him to ask them out.
Do you NOT UNDERSTAND that Jennifer Garner loves him, that they have children, or is it that you don't care? Maybe you have never been in a relationship that meant anything to you, so you don't know what it feels like to have your love be part of your pain because you don't know how to fix everything that's wrong. Is that why you keep offering him a vision of something easier for him to walk into instead of keeping a respectful distance and genuinely hoping that he and his wife can mend their relationship and keep their family together?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 26, 2016 @ 4:58 p.m.
When do I get to have friends?
March 26, 2016
For how many more years is the conglomerate going to invade my privacy, so that my getting to know people means making them vulnerable to the conglomerate's abuses?
I meet people who want to get to know me. I feel like I can't give them my phone number when they ask for it because as soon as they call me, the conglomerate will get their phone numbers, invade their privacy, publicize their personal lives, and do to them or threaten to do to them everything that it has done to me.
A lot of people whom I have met since I moved to the Boston area from Vermont in 2011 have thought that I didn't want to be friends with them because I wouldn't give them my phone number or my email address or take theirs.
I always feel bad when I have to give people my phone number or my email address, or when I have to call or email them, because I know that our spoken or written conversations will be observed or even recorded by however many people are invading my privacy, and that the conglomerate will also be able to invade the lives of those people as soon as it knows who they are and has their information.
It's all illegal. There is no reason for anyone to hack my phone or my email, my bank account or my food stamps card, and there's certainly no reason for the media, corporations and individual people to then publicize the information that they're getting from their illegal invasions of my privacy. The conglomerate treats me as if I have no rights, and as if everything about me is fodder for its sick amusement, no matter how isolating and destructive that amusement is to me and to everyone around me.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 26, 2016 @ 3:05 p.m.
The Boston Globe is threatening my old friends with voyeurism and involuntary pornography.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 26, 2016 @ 7:37 a.m.
Friday, March 25, 2016
Starbucks
March 25, 2016
I guess the $3 and $4 and $5, sometimes $10, at a time, that I could never really afford and that I spent anyway at Starbucks over the years don't matter to you at all. You'll team up with any rich person to make things more painful for me.
The ads produced specifically by corporate Starbucks to promote crime and personally target me. The Wet Floor signs permanently left on dry floor. The coughing by staff and customers. The usually dirty bathrooms that customer service people in the second decade of the 21st century seem to think it's not their job to clean, and where I turn off the light when I can and hope there's no hidden cameras when I can't. The Starbucks where a male customer sat next to me and coughed several times a minute until I objected and started taking his picture to publish online as a harasser, at which point he and a few other customers started yelling at me. That ended by him being given his own table by the manager and my being escorted from the premises by the police while the manager brought the smiling harasser a cup of water, even though I had called the police first because of what was happening. I was told never to go to that Starbucks again.
The spring and part of the summer of 2014, when I was working and work started at 7:00 a.m. The only places open where I could get food when I left the shelter at or before 6 a.m. were the Dunkin' Donuts and the Starbucks near Broadway Station. Guests of the Pine Street Inn aren't allowed to keep food in their lockers, so if I were going to buy food, I had to buy what I could from the places that were open. Did you think that I WANTED to spend $20/day on food, from my $10/hour salary?
Even when I buy food at the grocery store, once the people who produce it know, from invasions of my privacy, that I have bought their product, they often change the packaging to be degrading to me. That has happened over and over since 2011. It is also something that many businesses that produce food have done, even when I have never bought their food. Food shopping is always depressing and upsetting, like almost every other chore that I have to do, because I am tormented everywhere, by an unbelievable number of people who really think that I deserve what is happening to me.
Why would it be happening if I didn't deserve it? That's probably what they think. Why does anything happen that someone doesn't deserve, whether it's someone being persecuted by one person or thousands of people being persecuted by thousands of people, or one person being persecuted by thousands of people?
That something is happening doesn't mean that it's right. It's incredible how many people who have no difficulty thinking of all the times in their lives when people were unfair to THEM, who talk about their unhappiness and their pain, can degrade me in the same sentence that they're using to talk about poor, damaged them; people I've never had anything to do with in my life, people who don't know anything about me except for what they've heard from the conglomerate's propaganda or from people who don't realize that my blogs are not the result of my being delusional. I am systematically, viciously dehumanized to an extreme that I don't know has ever happened before to one person, by so many people, for such a long time. NOBODY could deserve what is happening to me.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 4:20 p.m.
The media's insistence on accusing me of trying to date celebrities is not helping this terrible situation.
March 25, 2016
All it does is make everything worse.
LEAVE ME ALONE! I AM NOT TRYING TO DATE CELEBRITIES!
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 2:52 p.m.
People send threats of violence, including rape and murder, to my YouTube blogs.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 12:14 p.m.
Nobody should be surprised if this generation's children grow up thinking that it's normal and funny to bully someone to death.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 12:09 p.m.
Star Market has no right to track my purchases and publicize them.
March 25, 2016
It is an invasion of my privacy for Star Market to do that.
I have had almost nothing except bad experiences with Star Market and Shaws supermarkets over the past 6 years. I have to buy groceries somewhere. Because of the abuse to which I am subjected, I hate going to the grocery store. When I lived in Braintree, I bought as much food at a time as I could, so that I would not have to go to the grocery store for a week or two weeks. When I was out of toilet paper, that's when I went to the Braintree Shaws, where there were Wet Floor signs everywhere, where I was stalked and coughed at by customers and staff, where there were ads and displays everywhere promoting child molestation and other sexual abuse or personally targeting me.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 12:02 p.m.
I am not provoking these people.
March 25, 2016
They are mistreating me because they think that it's fun to do that. That my time is wasted by it, that I'm trying to get through school; those things don't matter to them. That I have gotten bullied every day for more than 6 years doesn't matter to them, either.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 11:28 a.m.
"No Colored Allowed In This Class. Get Out, You Smelly, Gross, Crazy Colored."
March 25, 2016
Nobody said that to me during the class that I had today.
What did happen was that a male student who has cough-harassed me several times since the beginning of the semester repeatedly coughed at me during class. I confronted him about it and he didn't stop until I took out a tape recorder, started it, and put it on my desk.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 11:25 a.m.
"No Colored Allowed. Colored Bathroom Downstairs."
March 25, 2016
It doesn't say that outside the women's restroom at Bunker Hill Community College. If it did, I think that President Obama would do something to discourage it.
There are two Caution cones permanently outside the women's restroom at Bunker Hill Community College.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 11:22 a.m.
My blogs are censored while the people who criminally invade my privacy are able to say whatever they want about me.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 8:10 a.m.
I can't publish pictures of the ads because this blog is disabled from publishing pictures from my phone.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 8:09 a.m.
The ads that GRUBHUB has all over public trains suggest that GRUBHUB hacks my phone and my email, criminally invading my privacy and the privacy of everyone whom I ever talk to or email.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 8:08 a.m.
Ben Affleck: I hate your guts. I will never go out with you. Please leave me alone. Stop harassing me.
March 25, 2016
A few days ago, I thought about publishing a page describing an SNL or similar skit about a woman being unhappily pursued around a store by a giant bag of Doritos. Maybe I should have. I didn't want to be too mean, saying something about "Laughing at, not with."
I don't know what to do about this person. I have tried everything.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 5:54 a.m.
If I wanted to date a celebrity, I would be dating a celebrity.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 5:34 a.m.
The White House can't be bothered to publish another post about terrorist murders in Brussels this week; it has the same picture from Tuesday, showing the President with his hand under his nose, and a caption about "this morning's horrific attacks in Brussels."
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 5:33 a.m.
I spent most of my adult life trying to establish my mental and emotional health, and it's like I woke up sane while unbelievably sick people are running the world.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 5:25 a.m.
Although an 18-year-old woman was gang raped in Brooklyn after being the victim of sexual abuse by her father and the charges were dismissed against all of the abusers, the New York Times is promoting father-daughter incest above another code article promoting voyeurism and involuntary pornography.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 5:21 a.m.
There doesn't seem to be anything stopping the media from horrifically victimizing me.
March 25, 2016
They're hacking my phone.
They're hacking my email.
They're committing and encouraging crime against me and other people.
They have no conscience about any of it.
Nothing that I say or do has ever stopped any of it.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 25, 2016 @ 5:17 a.m.
Thursday, March 24, 2016
"You're a fucking deluded slagwhore."
March 24, 2016
That's one of several abusive messages that various people have sent to my present and past YouTube blogs over the past week. I can't publish pictures of them because this written blog was disabled from publishing pictures from my phone weeks ago, when I was publishing pages about rape at the University of Virginia.
Also this week, someone sent me a message saying that he or she hoped that I would get hit hard in the face.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 9:51 p.m.
Slaves
March 24, 2016
That's the address for the pages of search results for a Google search of the term "human trafficking millions of people per year."
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 8:54 p.m.
Misogyny encourages child abuse.
March 24, 2016
First, the conglomerate tells everyone that women are defective, and that women should therefore be grateful for any sexual attention from men, no matter how offensive or invasive that attention is. Then, the conglomerate tells everyone whom it has mentally crippled into being unable to have normal, healthy, age-appropriate, adult relationships that having sex with children is an acceptable alternative to adults having sex with each other. It forces women into self-conscious, sexual passivity toward men, forces men into constant bravado and objectifying women to such an extreme that they hate themselves for liking women as human beings and think that they have to show off to each other by degrading their own girlfriends or wives, and encourages everyone to think that sex is either a public activity in which adults are tortured for amusement or a furtive one in which children are forced to meet the sexual needs of all of the adults who hate themselves or the people whom those adults are dating or to whom they are married.
That women are human beings is denied. That children are human beings who have to have protection during their young, vulnerable years so that they are able to grow to be healthy, independent adults is denied. That the conglomerate is forcing the world into a social system that is a hierarchy of sexual predation is denied.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 8:28 p.m.
Having strong pelvic muscles also helps during childbirth.
March 24, 2016
The title of this page is for everyone who thinks that women who have orgasms quickly and easily are sexual deviants who are unmaternal by definition.
That's the address for the pages of search results for a Google search of the term "childbirth easier strong pelvic floor."
If you want the mother of your children to be in labor for hours and always needing a bathroom, you should perpetuate every antiquated Madonna/whore stereotype. Enjoy your lifetime of Internet porn while she channels her sexual frustration into Facebook drama.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 5:58 p.m.
What do you know? Brian Williams didn't get a college degree.
March 24, 2016
Did he drop out right before he was supposed to take Ethics?
Considering how many of the people listed in the article called "Lessons from famous college dropouts" didn't get college degrees, it's not that surprising that the world is falling apart. There are some good people listed; however, the picture at the beginning of the page is of Steve Jobs.
Making money and gaining recognition are not the only types of success that matter.
The conglomerate is characterized by a total refusal of intelligence and empathy. It is a rapacious, smug, self-congratulatory hive of moronic attitudes and behaviors. It is impervious to thought, driven by the most corrupt manifestations of the worst of human nature. It is shocked by nothing, halted by no evidence of the evil that it's doing to the world; it is a grinning, deaf, death mask.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 11:57 a.m.
It's sad, what happens to a lot of people in the entertainment industry, and what they do to the world because of what they turn into.
March 24, 2016
The performing arts are supposed to support the human spirit, and add to the world's awareness. Naked, degraded bodies and war; that's all that most of the entertainment industry seems to want to be.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 11:26 a.m.
To make every conversation about sex is degrading; it is sexual harassment, and the things that have happened to me are CRIMINAL.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 11:17 a.m.
The conglomerate wants to define me to the world by the crimes that it has committed against me.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 11:00 a.m.
I am not trying to be a sex educator.
March 24, 2016
I do not want people approaching me to remind me of what has happened to me or to talk about masturbation.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 10:59 a.m.
I am not a freak; the conglomerate is horrifically ignorant.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 10:57 a.m.
Women who have a lot of orgasms smell better and have fewer urinary incontinence problems.
March 24, 2016
These are the addresses for the pages of search results for a search from today of these terms:
-stronger pelvic muscles prevent incontinence
-orgasm strengthens pelvic floor
-orgasms flush bacteria
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 10:55 a.m.
Misogyny online
March 24, 2016
That's the address for the pages of search results for a Google search from today of the term "Misogyny online."
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 10:33 a.m.
Misogyny in the media
March 24, 2016
Those are the pages of search results for a Google search from today of the term "Misogyny in the media."
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 10:31 a.m.
The only mention of the Brussels murders at the first page of the Boston Globe's website today has code promotion of voyeurism and involuntary pornography.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 24, 2016 @ 10:28 a.m.
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Why I have influence, when I have it
March 23, 2016
I'm not constantly sucking up to people or ripping other people apart to try to get it. I try not to manipulate. I don't even want as much influence as I have; I am motivated by my concern about the world and my need to take care of myself, not because I want to be a big, important person who impresses people. I keep my distance from very powerful people because I don't want to have to worry about being so near all that power.
I'm not GREEDY.
My interactions with celebrities have done nothing except make my life worse. They are the worst liability that I have caused to myself throughout this ordeal of more than 6 years. For anyone to accuse me of trying to date a celebrity is to accuse me of not having the ability to realize what horrible abuse is. Only loneliness, or wanting to know what horrible thing they're doing or planning to do next, gets me to pay attention to them anymore, and sometimes a feeling of responsibility to some of them because I got involved in their lives before.
It's not as if I haven't noticed that I have wasted the last years of my youth hoping that such and such a person will improve. All that did was make the conglomerate ridicule me, and make the people who I hoped would get better think that I deserved the ridicule; they never seemed to realize that they were the reason that I looked stupid, because I tried to take them seriously and to care about them, and they treated me like garbage, every last one of them.
The men would rather do anything than respect me, even hurt themselves physically and call it devotion, and resent me for not thinking it's enough. The women would rather do anything than believe that I would not hurt them or their relationships. I would NEVER want to live like them, in that anti-intellectual, soul-sucking, image-obsessed void.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 10:51 p.m.
Leonardo DiCaprio
March 23, 2016
What do you want now? What else do you want to take from me, to hurt people who knew me in the past, to scrounge around to get any sort of rumor you possibly can going about me?
What else do you need? You won your awards. Can you not just leave me alone?
I don't have $1,000 a month. You are a multimillionaire. What are you trying to get from me? Do you need for the entire world to be jeering at me, so you can feel like you're smarter than I am? You need some kind of final victory over me? You don't think you have it already? You think more has to happen to me?
People don't talk about you because they know that you would sue them if they did. I don't have the money to do that, so everybody talks about me. Have you noticed that I don't talk about them unless they force me to do that by blabbing about me first? I don't name names unless I think that I have to do that to defend myself from them. I don't need anything from them; who would they be among the rich, famous and politically powerful if it weren't for the currency of their dirty little stories about me, no matter how long ago their versions took place or if what they say is true at all.
You've had more sex in a month than I have had in my life, and you don't seem to think that makes you a slut. LEAVE ME ALONE!
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 10:08 p.m.
Cambridge is supposed to be the land of brilliant people.
March 23, 2016
It would not be so difficult for me to meet and date one of them if the conglomerate hadn't done so much damage to my life.
I don't know why anyone would want to live the way that I have to live.
I'm also so unhappy that I don't know what I'd be like if I tried to date someone. I don't want to date celebrities, though; why would I, after what's happened to me?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 9:28 p.m.
I can't publish pictures of the abusive things that people are writing to me at YouTube because this blog is disabled from publishing pictures.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 9:16 p.m.
I'll never forget the time that a Samaritans suicide prevention volunteer phone counselor screamed at me to kill myself and slammed down the phone.
March 23, 2016
In a way, it was funny. I was suicidal. I had a suicide plan, which I said that I had when the conversation started. That hotline has had some volunteers who are good, and others who aren't.
He was really impatient with me, did not want to hear anything that I said, and finally said, in a mean tone of voice, something like, "So, you're depressed and alone; is there anything else," implying that he had better things to do than talk to me.
I don't know that people like to think of suicide as something that anyone does because of feeling powerless and therefore angry. Women are particularly socially punished for having angry feelings that make them suicidal; if you don't conform to the stereotype of the weeping woman who feels better if you tell her she's not worthless, if you know that you're not worthless and your problem is that everyone treats you like you are and it's ruining your life and so you're angry about it, people don't like it.
I told the Samaritans guy "You sound like a moron to me; I would never talk to anyone who called a crisis line the way that you're talking to me."
He said, "Yeah? Well, you sound like a BITCH to me! Never call here again! Follow your PLAN!"
Then he slammed down the phone. It was about 10 years ago.
I couldn't help thinking it was funny; who ever heard of a suicide prevention counselor who told someone "Go kill yourself"?
I laughed and cried hysterically for a few hours. The next day, I wrote a bad check, bought a handgun, had the guy at the gun shop show me how to put it together, went out into the woods, and got as far as being about to put the loaded gun in my mouth.
I am not sure why I didn't do it. I think I was scared that I hadn't loaded the gun right and it wouldn't work, that I'd blow off part of my head and live disfigured and disabled.
A few days later, I brought the gun to the store and returned it, and did not then end my miserable life.
All of that happened before I got harassed in the apartment building where I lived in Vermont, before any famous people knew who I was, before the next phase of my torture by the world started, before the privacy invasions and sexual harassment and slut-shaming and voyeurism.
Every time that I think the worst thing that could ever happen to me has already happened, I'm wrong. There's always someone in my future who will make it all worse.
The conglomerate already knows this story. It's one of the things that I wrote about when I started writing things and sending them to the New Yorker, a few months after it happened. They don't care.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 2:52 p.m.
Caution cones everywhere, like Ku Klux Klan symbols of misogyny.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 2:22 p.m.
What's the conglomerate going to do, tell the world that everything that's happened is my delusion, except for the voyeurism, which it will tell the world that I wanted?
March 23, 2016
What about everybody else who has gotten victimized by the voyeurism that was meant to humiliate me specifically? How's the conglomerate going to explain that?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 1:02 p.m.
How many more lies are going to get told about me?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 12:59 p.m.
It is sickening that President Obama has encouraged people who stalk me and who call it "doing their jobs."
March 23, 2016
I'm being stalked at several train stations today.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 12:57 p.m.
"Aaron Kamholtz"
March 23, 2016
That's the name of someone who is in an ad on a public train. The caption of the ad is "Business is BIOTECH."
Am I going to be prevented from getting hired when I graduate from the biotechnology academic program that I'm taking, or forced to submit to being sexually harassed and bullied at work to be able to work?
How many more years do I have to get welfare because I'm abused when I try to work, or abused and then lied about and fired, and not supported by the government agencies that are supposed to investigate discrimination?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 12:27 p.m.
Some of the things that happened today
March 23, 2016
2VCL 30
7222 VS
3200 XL
332 LV2
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 9:15 p.m.
Apple's "Shot on iPhone 6s" ads block windows for women who live at the Pine Street Inn.
March 23, 2016
If Apple would like to donate money to the Pine Street Inn, I'm sure that the money would help, especially since the shelter lost funding this year.
Do the ads have to be on the building for the shelter to get money, or is the shelter not getting any money for being the scaffold for those ads?
The Pine Street Inn is flanked by expensive apartment buildings. There are no ads on those buildings. Sick and elderly, or working, homeless women don't deserve to live somewhere that the windows aren't blocked by ads? Is that what Apple is saying?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 10:36 a.m.
Citizens Bank should stop promoting child molestation.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 8:04 a.m.
When is the next act of terrorism going to happen in the United States, while the government, corporations and media waste their time and money promoting crime?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 7:50 a.m.
At the first page of the White House's official website, the only mention of yesterday's murders by terrorists is a small picture of the President referencing vagina smell.
March 23, 2016
What's the White House trying to say, that it's good that the terrorists killed and injured some women?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 7:48 a.m.
The Boston Globe hasn't removed the picture of the Boston Superintendent of Schools referencing a handjob from the first page of its website, and the New York Times has added stories promoting child abuse to the first page of its website, while the White House's official website hasn't removed the promotion of toddler pornography from its website.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 23, 2016 @ 7:26 a.m.
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
Ben Affleck
March 22, 2016
It is your decision whether or not to get divorced, as it is your decision whether or not to vacation in Europe this year.
Because the conglomerate never ceases to attack me about whichever person it thinks it can accuse me of trying to sexually ensnare, no matter how many times I have rejected him nor how many times he has threatened to kill me, I thought I'd mention again that I am NOT INTERESTED in dating you. Hopefully, my rejection of you tonight will prevent the conglomerate's accusations for a week, or at least the rest of this week.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 9:02 p.m.
Living parchment
March 22, 2016
That's the address for the pages of search results for a Google search from today of the term "Phi Gamma Delta rape."
Scrawling epithets on the bodies of sexual assault victims seems to be a popular post-assault amusement for perpetrators.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 5:48 p.m.
"This site is maintained by the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners and is funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Sciences, a federal agency that fosters innovation, leadership and a lifetime of learning."
March 22, 2016
That's what it says at the bottom of the sign-in page for "Massachusetts Libraries."
I can't publish a picture of it because this blog is disabled from publishing pictures from my phone. It was disabled several weeks ago, when I was publishing pages about rape at the University of Virginia.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 4:28 p.m.
The New York Times is also prioritizing a visual joke about cunnilingus when a woman has her period.
March 22, 2016
I guess the New York Times doesn't think that the world is seeing enough blood today.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 12:32 p.m.
The New York Times is spending some of the first page of its website speculating about penis size.
March 22, 2016
Most of the conglomerate does that every day. It thinks that talking about penis size is a priority.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 12:24 p.m.
It seems like the Brussels killing has taken some of the first page of the New York Times's website from the several stories about Apple and Tim Cook's lies about his concern for people's privacy, and the New York Times's habitual promotion of sexual abuse.
March 22, 2016
I'm sure that everything will be back to the conglomerate's version of "normal" by the end of the week.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 12:06 p.m.
The Boston Globe spent all night thinking of horrible jokes to make about me.
March 22, 2016
That's how it spends most of its time.
What if it spent most of its time investigating terrorism and trying to think of how to help the world be safer?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 12:00 p.m.
The first page of the White House's website has the promotion of sexual abuse all over it, and did for weeks before the terrorist attack in Brussels.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 11:46 a.m.
The front page of the Boston Globe is plastered with promotion of sexual abuse, including a picture of the Boston superintendent of schools that mimics the handjob-suggestive picture that CVS put at the entrance to the CVS in Central Square because of the first page of the White House's website.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 11:44 a.m.
Monday, March 21, 2016
How many people are being victimized by voyeurism and involuntary pornography in Massachusetts and around the world, because of what the conglomerate is doing to me?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 22, 2016 @ 12:06 a.m.
Adele's "Hello" video has had more than 1 billion views.
March 21, 2016
Is that how many people will see the SICK, SADISTIC, ILLEGAL videos of me?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 9:12 p.m.
The amount of responsibility that I have is really out of proportion to my salary, especially considering how many people who have no money problems use their time at work to promote human rights abuses.
March 21, 2016
The pressure that I have far outweighs any ego gratification that I ever have from being where I am in the power dynamics of the world. As I have said several times every year since 2010, I am not directly powerful, I am only influential, and sometimes I'm not only not influential, I am a liability to people whom I try to help and whom the conglomerate then attacks.
I'm not seeking power. It would be nice if the people who have it would use it responsibly. My main goal, after these 6 years of horrific stress, is not to have a heart attack before I'm 50.
I have chosen the right academic and employment paths; I don't need to change those. I need the abuses to stop.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 8:05 p.m.
I don't appreciate the White House goading me about Merrick Garland.
March 21, 2016
I am a Democrat, and the White House knows that.
The Republicans declared that they would block any Supreme Court nomination by President Obama. Their reason for this is that they hope that a Republican President will be elected who will then nominate a conservative judge.
For me to criticize anything about the nomination of Mr. Garland risks encouraging the Republican attacks on his nomination.
I am so tired of the White House gloating over its promotion of sexual abuse, to the exclusion of every other concern, posting its sickeningly cutesy praise for criminals, laughing in my face about it when there is so much at stake for the United States and the world.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 7:49 p.m.
Ryan Reynolds
March 21, 2016
If the rumors about your wife and Ben Affleck aren't true, then I'm sure that you both can understand how I feel about the way that I am treated.
I have never even met him. I say No all the time.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 6:46 p.m.
The conglomerate has based a lot of its abuse of me on the idea that there were people whom I had trouble getting over when I was younger.
March 21, 2016
Why, then, does the conglomerate act as if the celebrities whom I have rejected have no obligation to politely accept my rejection and to stop harassing me?
I never did anything to anyone like what that the conglomerate has done to me, nor would I ever want to treat someone the way that the conglomerate treats me, nor have I ever advocated for anyone to be treated the way that the conglomerate treats me. NOBODY should have to live the way that the conglomerate forces me to live.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 5:34 p.m.
I don't choose the addresses that videos get when I publish them at YouTube.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 4:42 p.m.
DV-707 Rhode Island
March 21, 2016
That is the license plate of a car that is at an intersection in Boston. The person driving it is female.
I think that a lot of women who promote child molestation do that because they don't know how to have good relationships with men. It feels easier to them to exploit children than to meet men who respect them. Whether or not they realize why they're giving up on age-appropriate relationships is irrelevant to the damage that they do to the children whom they molest.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 4:10 p.m.
Robert Pattinson is not the only celebrity whom I could have started dating years ago if that were what I had wanted.
March 21, 2016
Why would I tell people no over and over if I wanted to tell them yes?
When the conglomerate makes false accusations toward me about what I'm trying to do, all it does is cause me to feel like I have to publicly reject people whom I have already rejected. Sometimes, those people get upset, and then they attack me for rejecting them, calling me all the same things that the rest of the conglomerate is calling me for supposedly trying to attract them.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 3:00 p.m.
Apple has promoted voyeurism and involuntary pornography for years.
March 21, 2016
Why does anyone think that Apple cares about people's privacy?
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 2:54 p.m.
2 Caution cones outside the women's restroom at Bunker Hill Community College
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 2:34 p.m.
The conglomerate lives in my past, to try to excuse the way that it treats me in the present.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 12:20 p.m.
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Please respect all of my policies, even those that I don't publish every day.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 1:08 a.m.
I don't choose excerpts or supporting information for code purposes; the conglomerate does.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 1:07 a.m.
I don't choose the addresses that videos get when people publish them at YouTube.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 1:06 a.m.
Chinese children, taken from "7 families," videotaped in the bathroom, shower and their beds, crying and homesick, for a reality TV show
March 21, 2016
That's the Web address for the first episode. It was published in 2014, 4 years after the conglomerate began promoting child molestation.
It only played for a few minutes and then stopped. I don't know what happens after the horrifying first part of it.
Probably, the video was edited to try to show the children "adapting" to the situation. It's all horrible; children do adapt to everything that adults make them do. That doesn't mean that everything that happens to them ought to happen to them.
Many child soldiers learn to like to kill; that's another example of what children adapt to when they have to adapt to it.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, March 21, 2016 @ 1:04 a.m.
Mental health discrimination
March 20, 2016
How much of the conglomerate's persecution of me has it excused itself for on the basis of my having a psychiatric history?
Which of these sentences describe some of what the conglomerate has thought about me?
-Psychiatric patients are hypersexual; crazy women are more sexual than normal women.
-Crazy people never have normal relationships with anyone. Everything in their lives is always crazy. Unlike real people, they don't have problems in some parts of their lives and not in others; whenever anything that crazy people do seems like it's not crazy, that's because whatever they do that seems normal is either something that's not as good as what a real person could do or there's something else inherently wrong with it.
-Psychiatric patients have no awareness of their actions in the past or present. She doesn't know how wrong some of the things that she has done are; we should talk about them for the rest of her life, because she thinks she's never done anything wrong. Her being too insane to know that she ever did anything wrong does not mean that she's not a bad person, so we should treat her like she's bad AND crazy.
-When she's angry, it's not because we did something wrong. It's because she's crazy.
-When she's sad, it's not because we did something wrong. It's because she's crazy.
-If there's a man whom she rejects, it's because she's too crazy to realize how much he likes her or she's too crazy to discern that he would be good for her. Her objections to his behavior are, of course, negligible and ought to be ignored and even laughed at. How could she be right about her choices for her life? Crazy people can't make those decisions.
-Crazy people should be grateful that anyone wants to date them, because they are not as good as real people. That is particularly true of crazy women. Crazy men are usually not that crazy; they are merely damaged, and actually a lot of fun, and, unlike crazy women, they are creative, interesting, free spirits, and not actually crazy. If a woman calls a man crazy for stalking her, it's because she doesn't know what real passion is; he should not stop trying to show her that!
-Crazy people don't have real feelings, so it's funny and not bad to videotape them with hidden cameras in bathrooms and showers.
-Crazy people are too sensitive. If she says that the illegal videos that we caused to be filmed of her, which we have obtained, distributed and publicized, cause her to be suicidal, it's because crazy people are always suicidal and not because we did something wrong.
-If a crazy person can do something, that means that what he or she did was not that difficult.
-If a crazy person achieves something, that means that what he or she achieved is trivial.
"You're Crazy": The All-Purpose, No Perpetrator Cognitive Distortions Or Dissonance Admitted, Excuse For Abuse.
Copyright L. Kochman, March 20, 2016 @ 10:33 p.m./title edited March 21, 2016 @ 12:06 a.m.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)