Woods-Mullen Shelter Is A Crime Against Humanity: July 2016

Sunday, July 31, 2016

A world out of control since 2010

August 1, 2016

Victoria's Secret has my phone hacked and has created vicious new ads about its criminal invasions of my privacy.

August 1, 2016

I don't even know how many corporations are publishing ads ridiculing me, based on their criminal invasions of my privacy.

I don't care about the opinions of vicious people, but they don't have the right to ruin my life.

"cuntasaur"

July 31, 2016

This is one of the many hate blogs about me that are Google search results for my name:

It's also one of the few hate blogs about me that I was ever able to get disabled, even briefly. Most of the others have host websites that refuse to take responsibility for the content that people publish.

These are pictures of most of the page that corresponds with that search result:

One of these people is going to kill me eventually. There are too many people telling the world to hate me for that not to be what's going to happen to me.

Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, August 1, 2016 @ 12:09 a.m. I'll publish the preliminary page and similar pages later today or tomorrow.

I have erased this page.

July 31, 2016

This is disgusting.

July 31, 2016

Hillary Clinton

July 31, 2016

I didn't watch one minute of the Democratic National Convention. I didn't have to; the people managing your social media made it clear that you're going to attack me every day, even in the total absence of criticism from me.

I said, months ago, that I'm a Democrat and I'll be voting for the Democratic candidate for President. I also said that I would probably criticize the Democrats more than the Republicans during the race; why criticize the people across the street when you have so many problems in your own house?

You know that attacking me makes rich people and corporations and the media happy. It's sickening. You're no feminist.

Your choice of Vice Presidential candidate could not have been more pointedly vicious toward me and pandering toward the media.

You're a miserable, corrupt bully, as bad as President Obama.

I am a human being who lives a horrifically degraded life. You are exploiting the victim-blaming lies that have made my life a hell since 2010, so that you can win the Presidency of what's supposed to be a democracy.

My only personal freedom is not being locked up.

The conglomerate forces me to have no other personal freedom.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

They want your fear.

July 31, 2016

http://atthedarkendofthestreet.com/blog/reliving-a-nightmare-betty-jean-owens-had-the-courage-to-testify-52-years-ago/

No code.

The name "Rugrat" from "The Wolf of Wall Street" was probably a joke about my body hair.

July 30, 2016

I never asked or consented to anyone getting SICK, SADISTIC, ILLEGAL video of my pubic hair or the other body hair filmed by hidden cameras in the showers and bathrooms of homeless shelters, psychiatric units and everywhere else that the conglomerate's social torture of me since 2010 caused me to be the target of criminal voyeurism.

Sometimes, I was so poor that I didn't the money to buy plastic razors to shave my legs.

I have never done anything to Instagram or to Rihanna.

July 30, 2016

Those are pictures of a post that Rihanna published a few minutes ago at her Instagram.

Every Instagram page of everyone's Instagram says "Find it for free."

Rihanna is certainly not the only person who publishes horrible things about me in the total absence of my doing or saying anything about her or paying any attention to her at all. Hundreds of people all over the world have done that every day since 2010.

I am viciously bullied by these people for no reason, and it's ruining my life. It has made me homeless. It has made me the target of emotional abuse, stalking, voyeurism and involuntary pornography. It has ruined my employment opportunities and is in the process of ruining my educational opportunies.

It takes nothing from a person not to bully another person. I don't know why so many people think that I deserve their abuse.

Couldn't the media try to help abducted children and teenagers every day?

FKA twigs is not a gold digger.

July 30, 2016

If she were, she would have tried to make her music generic, and she would have done that years before she started dating the boyfriend whose fame prompted that gossip from unkind people.

She also would have looked around for other rich and famous people to ensnare, and she hasn't done that. She never seems even to flirt with other stars. She gets mad at me, that's all, like all the other girlfriends of famous people who have thought about dating me.

I don't want to date famous people. Her relationship with her boyfriend is not contingent on my decisions.

I might need to take a break from writing about serious things outside of my own life for a while.

July 30, 2016

This summer was not the way that I wanted it to be. The stress from the last several weeks of the Spring 2016 semester at school did not end with the end of the semester. I had hoped to take a couple of classes this summer, but my having gotten punished by the school for reporting being harassed and stalked during the Spring 2016 semester was too much for me and I hated being there.

The school administration has done nothing to confront the student who was the main instigator of my being bullied in one of my classes of the Spring 2016 semester.

I have a bill of almost $600 from the class that I dropped at the beginning of the summer. I can't take classes again until I have paid that bill, so I might not be at school until the Spring 2017 semester, when hopefully I'll have it paid.

It wouldn't be a problem to pay that money before the beginning of the Fall 2016 semester if I could work for the temporary employment agency for which I worked off and on for 15 years until I got fired in 2014 because of a vicious lie.

I had hoped that this summer would be better than my past several summers, that I'd take my classes, work at school until the end of June, get some things done that I didn't have time to do when I was taking 4 classes during the Spring 2016 semester. I thought I'd try to volunteer and/or try to start meeting people in Boston, even though I didn't know what to do about the privacy invasions that have ruined my ability to have a social life since the conglomerate began to persecute me.

The summer's almost over and I have spent days at a time in my apartment, for weeks, too depressed or upset to leave. When I try to make myself do normal things, the conglomerate frequently attacks me.

Sometimes I can deal with my pressures, and sometimes I can't.

"you are a retarded a-- dumb b----"

July 30, 2016

This is a picture of messages that people sent to one of my past YouTube blogs, "Please don't kill me," over the past couple of days:

These are pictures of messages that people have sent to another of my past YouTube blogs, "Lena Kochman Boston," over the past few days:

Dress code

July 30, 2016

I don't want to scrutinize people for what they're wearing. If they're not trying to promote the conglomerate's agenda, if they're dressing normally and wearing things that they like, I don't want to have to worry about it.

The landlord that I had from 2013 to 2014 should be sued for voyeurism.

Please pass and respect the Martland Act.

July 30, 2016

Nobody should have to helplessly witness rape.

Preliminary page

July 30, 2016

No code, all policies operative, all the time.

Law enforcement, please arrest anyone who hacks my phone or my email or who criminally invades my privacy in other ways, even if the person who is doing those things is the most powerful person in the world.

Treat all forms of sexual abuse like the crimes that they are, including voyeurism and involuntary pornography; pass and respect laws against them.

Please pass and respect the Equal Rights Amendment.

It is journalistic failure when the media distorts a news story to be about something other than what that story is ostensibly about, or when the media promotes crime.

I don't choose excerpts or supporting information for code purposes.

I don't choose the addresses that videos get when I publish them at YouTube.

Policy for people who hack my phone:

When you hack my phone, which you don't have the right to do and which I don't want anyone to do, if you see something that could possibly be construed as being for the conglomerate's agenda by someone who wants to construe it that way, you can know that I am against the conglomerate's agenda no matter what.

If, while illegally hacking my phone, invading my privacy to a sickening degree, you see something that you would like to interpret as being supportive of the conglomerate's agenda or contradictory to what I'm publicly saying about any subject, you can know that I don't mean it that way.

I'm not hacking your phones. I don't want to hack phones, or email, or anything. I don't want to invade people's privacy.

You're doing something to me that I can't stop you from doing. I would stop you if I could. I have no obligation to stop being who I am just because I can't have privacy.

Some of the things that happened today

July 30, 2016

822 RW8

I don't know what the people who spray painted the "G" and "LP. PL." and the horizontal lines were trying to say.

Friday, July 29, 2016

For how many more years are people going to be financially rewarded for treating me like this?

July 29, 2016

That's a picture of the Tweet that's at the beginning of Rihanna's Twitter.

Rihanna is old enough to know better than this.

I have gotten bullied nonstop by a large and expanding group of people for more than 6 years. There is nothing that I say or that happens to me that stops them from thinking that I deserve their abuse.

Dean Eramo's lawsuit should be dismissed, and the University of Virginia should pay her legal fees, because the University of Virginia forced her to betray rape victims to keep her job, for years.

July 29, 2016

These are pictures of part of the article called "Is Rolling Stone about to get throttled in court over UVA rape report," written by Mr. Wyman and published yesterday by the Columbia Journalism Review:

This is a picture of the part of the Rolling Stone article which Mr. Wyman is referencing:

This is a picture of part of the Columbia Journalism Review's April 5, 2015 report called "Rolling Stone's investigation: 'A failure that was avoidable," written by Sheila Coronel, Steve Coll and Derek Kravitz:

That the man whom the Rolling Stone article describes as having raped Jackie with a beer bottle is described by Mr. Wyman as having "hesitate(d)" to participate in gang rape is questionable. I also don't know why Mr. Wyman calls the man a "fraternity member," when it seems clear from the Rolling Stone article and from the 04/05/15 Columbia Journalism Review report that he was never previously described as a member of a fraternity but as a potential pledge. If he was never inducted into Phi Kappa Psi, that explains why he was never identified from the Phi Kappa Psi's membership roster. Since the assault happened before the official rush season, he's probably not on a list of Phi Kappa Psi pledges, either.

This is another picure of part of the 04/05/15 CJR report:

Before the 04/05/15 CJR report was published, there was already information online suggesting that fraternities that want to drug, haze and rape people frequently don't register the parties at which they plan to do those things. It is also impossible that the University of Virginia's administration or UVA's Police Department or the Charlottesville Police Department haven't known for years that fraternities that want to drug, haze and rape people frequently don't register the parties at which they plan to do those things. Probably, there are registered fraternity parties at which people are drugged, raped and hazed, because fraternities know that they won't be prosecuted for their crimes.

This is the address for the pages of results for a Google search of the term "fraternity suspended unregistered":

https://www.google.com/search?ei=qLKbV_v5GYi-jwTqxaDwAg&q=fraternity+suspended+unregistered&oq=fraternity+suspended+unregistered&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.3...91130.97088.0.97584.17.15.2.0.0.0.405.3051.0j9j5j0j1.15.0....0...1c.1.64.mobile-gws-serp..0.15.2677...0j0i22i30j33i160j33i21.Xtlj6WOPx34

A discussion group that is part of a college class is usually informally organized; it's not something that would be on a transcript or a roster. Sometimes, the professor assigns the groups, and it could be that Jackie's professor for the class in which she had a discussion group in the Fall 2012 semester has a written or electronic record of which students were in each group. Even if that professor has no such record, shouldn't everyone who has attacked the Rolling Stone article try to get a roster for the class and to interview everyone who was in the class? Why don't all of the journalists who have attacked the Rolling Stone article ask the University of Virginia to disclose to them the rosters for Jackie's classes from the Fall 2012 semester, so that they can interview everybody? Why don't they interview all of Jackie's professors? They have accused Ms. Erdely of not having done enough investigation, haven't they? If they think they can do better, why don't they try?

There's no reason to believe that the University of Virginia's administration hasn't lied about whether or not it knows anything about the student whom the Rolling Stone article describes as having raped Jackie with a beer bottle.

It could be that Ms. Erdely should have given more Phi Kappa Psi fraternity members the chance to lie to her. It could also be that if she had talked to several of the fraternity members, Ms. Erdely could have gotten corroboration for Jackie's story from members who knew what happened and who thought it was bad.

There's no reason that reporters who want to know what happened can't try to interview as many Phi Kappa Psi members as they can. There's no law against that, nor is there a law against Phi Kappa Psi members telling the truth to reporters, police, lawyers who might be able to help them file reports that protect their privacy, or directly to the federal government. There's no law against those things, which doesn't mean that anyone who tries to do those things won't get attacked by the media and the rest of the conglomerate and by Phi Kappa Psi, other fraternities and the University of Virginia.

If Ms. Erdely had investigated Phi Kappa Psi's social media, she might have gotten information that could have led her to corroboration for Jackie's description of what happened. She might have discovered that even records of registered parties are frequently not maintained, which would have helped her and Rolling Stone when the media attacks against the Rolling Stone article began.

This is a picture of part of the Charlottesville Police Department's March 23, 2015 statement:

This is another picure of part of that police statement:

This is a picture of part of a January 8, 2016 article by T. Rees Shapiro of the Washington Post, called "Lawyers for U-Va. dean: Jackie lied to Rolling Stone about gang rape, 'invented' story":

Mr. Shapiro was not the only journaliat who inaccurately reported the conclusion that there "was no party at the fraternity on the night of the alleged attack." Other journalists reprinted that conclusion as if it were fact for months.

This is a picture of part of the July 1, 2016 declaration filed by Ms. Erdely in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment:

"September 17" from that document is September 17, 2014, two months before the Rolling Stone article was published on November 19, 2014.

This declaration, of which a copy is available for free online, refers to documentation that Ms. Erdely also gave to the court as part of her July 1, 2016 filing. That's what Ex. 15 at RS004410 is part of: documentation that includes Ms. Erdely's records of the investigation that she, Ms. Erdely, conducted.

It seems to me that a record of that conversation, and the specificity of what Jackie told Ms. Erdely, would be difficult for Ms. Erdely to convincingly fake. How would she fake something like that, in the midst of all of the other documentation that was filed for her on July 1, 2016? Has anyone accused Ms. Erdely of faking that documentation, of lying about the conversation that Jackie had with Dean Eramo in 2013 in which Dean Eramo verbally confirmed to Jackie that Dean Eramo had information that confirmed that Phi Kappa Psi had a party on September 28, 2012? It doesn't seem to me that anyone has.

There are only two things that could have happened to produce section 92 of Ms. Erdely's declaration. One is that Ms. Erdely faked her documentation to the court to try to prove that everyone who said, since the publication of the Rolling Stone article, that there was no party at the Phi Kappa Psi house on September 28, 2012 was lying. The other is that Dean Eramo knew that there was a party at September 28, 2012 at the Phi Kappa Psi and that it's one of the first things that Dean Eramo sought to confirm when Jackie first told Dean Eramo that Jackie was sexually assaulted.

Why would Dean Eramo have specifically tried to find out if there were a party on September 28, 2012, as one of the first things that Dean Eramo did in response to Jackie having told Dean Eramo that Jackie was sexually assaulted? Is it because Dean Eramo was familiar with the tactics of fraternities that try to deny that they have perpetrated sexual assault by not registering their parties and then by denying that that the parties happened?

It doesn't seem to me that Ms. Erdely has falsified her documentation. I have read the July 22, 2016 court filing by Dean Eramo's lawyer; there's no mention of Ms. Erdely's statement that Dean Eramo had told Jackie in 2013 that Dean Eramo had confirmed that there was a party at the Phi Kappa Psi house on September 28, 2012. Nobody has accused Ms. Erdely or Jackie, verbally or in any other way, of lying about Jackie's conversation with Dean Eramo. Maybe everybody is so sure that Rolling Stone's going to lose this lawsuit that nobody even noticed this one honest paragraph out of all the other honest paragraphs that Ms. Erdely wrote.

It's probable that Dean Eramo has, or had, records that documented her having confirmed that Phi Kappa Psi had a party on September 28, 2012. There might even be emails or other records between Dean Eramo and other UVA administrators and Phi Kappa Psi, confirming that Dean Eramo knew the party had happened. Shouldn't someone subpoena those records?

These are also pictures of part of the July 1, 2016 declaration filed for Ms. Erdely in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment:

"There are two other young women with similar stories to Jackie who have not come forward fully yet and we are trying to persuade them to in order to get punitive action against the fraternity," wrote Ms. Renda to Ms. Erdely.

How do you try to persuade people who don't exist? Doesn't it seem as if there were administrators at the University of Virginia who had email or phone conversations with those other two victims, and might even have spoken to them in person? Isn't it probable that the University of Virginia knows who they are?

Also, who told Ms. Renda that additional reports of sexual assault at Phi Kappa Psi filed after the Rolling Stone article was published indentifying Phi Kappa Psi as the fraternity where Jackie was raped would "create a credibility issue and take away our ability to kick off that frat"? The only people who would have had a credibility issue if those other two assault victims hadn't gotten too terrified to file formal reports would have been the people from Phi Kappa Psi who denied that Jackie got assaulted. If the Rolling Stone article hadn't gotten inaccurately discredited, the University would have had to investigate those other two assaults, and so would the Charlottesville Police Department.

This is what the 03/23/15 Charlottesville Police Department says about the two other alleged victims of sexual assault at Phi Kappa Psi:

At the time that the Charlottesville Police Department published that statement, that police department was not actively investigating the two other sexual assaults.

I haven't finished this page.

July 30, 2016

Mr. Wyman writes one sentence between his own conjecture, "this allegation may have made its way to the university as well," and his description of that conjecture as fact: "when in fact it was just another unsubstantiated story from the same unverified source the magazine had built the rest of its report on."

Mr. Wyman is no "casual reader"; he, like everyone else who has attacked the Rolling Stone article, has dismissed the possibility that anyone other than Jackie, Ms. Erdely and Rolling Stone might have lied about anything. The people who have had the most reason to lie are the ones who are being believed without proof by people such as Mr. Wyman. Having no verification for the statements of the people whom you want to believe, and yet printing what they say as if it's the truth, no matter how damaging what you publish is to the people whom you don't want to believe, is exactly what people such as Mr. Wyman have spent more than a year accusing Ms. Erdely and Rolling Stone of having done.

After Mr. Wyman describes his conjecture as fact, he has the gall to quote Mr. Volokh calling that conjecture possible "evidence." EVIDENCE. From conjecture to fact to EVIDENCE in four sentences.

I haven't finished writing this page.

Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, July 30, 2016 @ 2:52 a.m. I published my preliminary page and similar pages several hours ago, and will publish them again later today or tomorrow.