Friday, November 4, 2016

"A jury's willingness to slam a major media outlet for the impact of getting a story wrong" is exactly what the verdict DIDN'T prove.

November 4, 2016

The Washington Post is a much more prestigious media source than Rolling Stone, and the newspaper, and Mr. Shapiro, and all the other reporters at the Washington Post who attacked the Rolling Stone article, have exploited that prestige, WHICH HAS PROTECTED THEM FROM CONSEQUENCES FOR THEIR PERSISTENT MALICE AND JOURNALISTIC FAILURE.

This is the address of Mr. Shapiro's article from today, called "Jury finds reporter, Rolling Stone responsible for defaming U-Va. dean with gang rape story":



It's a sickening article.


Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, November 4, 2016 @ 8:01 p.m.