(When I published this page a couple of days ago, it had a picture of a letter that was sent to me from the Assistant Property Manager of my last apartment building./June 17, 2017).
When I moved to the building in March 2016, she was only a "Leasing Consultant."
Is the Massachusetts government going to give Chroma $40.5 million, the way it gave $40.5 million to Braintree Village for victimizing me in the EXACT SAME WAY?
That's the address of one of the articles about Braintree Village. Who knows if Braintree Village ever took the cameras out of the apartment from which I was evicted in 2014, or if Chroma will take the cameras out of the apartment where I was tortured again and from which I was evicted, AGAIN, while everyone who saw it happen the first time not only did nothing to stop it but vindictively enjoyed watching it happen, and HASN'T STOPPED ABUSING ME.
Months before I was forced to move because of my "false" accusations of voyeurism in the apartment, I asked the property manager to prevent this person from ever individually contacting me again; I'm sure she enjoyed being able to show off her promotion as part of her last letter to me.
To be honest, I can't count the number of times that someone WHO COMMITS CRIMES has messed up my life, while she's telling everyone that she's scared of me.
I moved to the building dreading that there would be cameras in the apartment. I cowered in the apartment for months, saying nothing about the hidden, illegal cameras that I knew were there, while the conglomerate tapped the cameras, laughed at my attempts to preserve what I could of my privacy, and screamed the equivalent of SLUT every day that I lived there. I knew that if I confronted anyone who worked at the building about the cameras, I would be called a crazy liar and forced to be homeless again, and that's what happened, while I did everything that I could to prevent it and had to helplessly live through every part of it again, like the HUMAN RIGHTS DISASTER that it is.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, June 15, 2017 @ 2:58 p.m.
June 17, 2017
I don't know how many times I have said that I didn't choose to live at Chroma. I never applied there and had never heard of it before I was approved for an apartment there last year.
What I applied to was a program for affordable housing (should I say low income housing, since that's the other term for it) that's part of the City of Cambridge. The program approves or rejects people's applications and then, if it approves someone's application, the program sends the person's profile to landlords, who then approve or reject the applicant for tenancy.
I had no say about anything. If you're approved for an apartment, you have to schedule an appointment to visit the apartment and then you have 24 hours to decide whether or not you'll take it. You can't choose anything about it; not the building, not the unit, nothing.
I liked the building and the apartment and the neighborhood. I knew the name of the building and some of its advertising were problematic; I didn't know what to do about it. I also knew, from what happened when I was trying to email and call landlords for an apartment that I could move to from my last apartment in 2014, that it is impossible to rent an apartment anywhere that the conglomerate won't attack me about. There were entire suburbs around the Boston area where I couldn't move because of their names:
That's the address for the Yahoo result for "suburbs around Boston."
No matter what I did, the conglomerate attacked me for it. There was an entire apartment building that was subsequently built in Boston after I was evicted in 2014, for which the name and advertising were derived from my phone being hacked and people being disgusting.
If I could have moved to another apartment from the apartment that I had from 2013 to 2014, I wouldn't have had an eviction on my record; I had a written agreement to move out in 3 months, but the conglomerate attacked me about every apartment that I emailed or called anyone about. There was even someone who would have rented to me, but the number of the apartment was 306 and I knew what the conglomerate would say about it, so I didn't, and I was evicted.
I know people who hacked my phone thought it was really funny that I wanted an apartment that had a balcony, but I wanted that because stalkers were driving around and parking outside my apartment every day, and at night. I wanted to be able to be outside sometimes and not have to worry about being ABDUCTED.
Cambridge is a nice place to live. Since by 2015 I knew that the conglomerate would attack me no matter where I lived, I didn't let what I knew the conglomerate would say about me deter me from applying for housing there.
That's the address for the first page of Yahoo results for "cambridge ma," for people who want to read about it rather than ignorantly attacking me because they can't think of anything else to do with their time.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, June 17, 2017 @ 10:07 a.m.
