I also felt that I had to accept the verbal warning of being disruptive in May 2016 because my only other option was for the school to have a hearing about me, and I knew that wouldn't be fair, either.
The Dean never apologized for having incorrectly accused me, even when it was proven by the end of the summer of 2016 that the Chinese teacher's attempt to fail me for the class was retaliatory and not what I deserved, and even when it was proven by the student stalking and harassing me online in September 2016 that he was the aggressor all along.
I don't have to accept any false accusations this time. I didn't choose the school from desperation or because I didn't know what else to do with my time. I really wanted to study the program that I had chosen, and most of my professors and classes were positive. However, it's not safe to be a student at a school that is led by a dishonest person, or by someone who seems only to have stopped the harassment that was happening in my Spring 2017 math class because she was afraid that the school's ongoing failure to prevent harassment would cause the school to be liable.
I'm sure that the questions that she asked the professor and students in my Summer 2017 French class during her "investigation" were designed to give her the answers that she wanted, to build a false case against me so that she can throw me out of school, and so that she doesn't have to take responsibility for improving the school, where probably half of the American students are illiterate from a public school system that is dysfunctional from 1st grade to 12 grade.
Copyright L. Kochman, July 1, 2017 @ 7:01 a.m.
