That's the address of an article that's at the first page of results for a Google search of "uva rolling stone."
Dean Eramo's lawsuit is not being stopped, while the conglomerate continues to promote sexual assault, including child molestation
Even when Jackie has given information, she has gotten called a liar about everything. Dean Eramo already forced Jackie to have a deposition, and then Dean Eramo tried to get everything that Jackie said in the deposition that Dean Eramo didn't like thrown out. Dean Eramo wants to win her lawsuit more than she cares about ruining Jackie's life, just as Dean Eramo cares more about protecting the school's reputation and her own job than she cares about stopping sexual assault at the University of Virginia.
No real investigation was made about what really happened; it was all a show to discredit Jackie and protect the people who raped her, the people who didn't care about her, and the people who lied to protect the school's reputation.
If Dean Eramo wins her lawsuit, it will be much easier for Phi Kappa Psi and three of Jackie's rapists to win their lawsuits. That's how these things happen; first, discredit the article, despite all evidence supporting what Jackie said. Then, get the magazine to say that it did something wrong. Then, file the lawsuits, based on the idea that irreparable damage was done to the reputations of the people who were negatively portrayed. Win one of those lawsuits, and that decision gets brought to the next lawsuit as if it is a form of evidence. It's the legal system's version of "everybody says it's true, so it must be true," even when "everybody" is lying.
In a room in which there are more rapists than victims, if anyone were to take a poll of everyone in the room, the majority opinion would not protect the victims.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, May 27, 2016 @ 1:11 a.m.
