It's probably difficult for one of Satan's Army to sue for libel, as hurt and humiliated as said demon might feel about being singled out; is that why?
That's a picture of the section from the July 3, 2016, first page of the Washington Post's website that corresponded to a July 1, 2016 Washington Post article.
This is the address for that article:
These are pictures of the article:
___________________________________
___________________________________
The lines separate pictures that I took of parts of the article that were not continuous.
For a few years, one of the words that the conglomerate used to ridicule me for the SICK, SADISTIC, ILLEGAL videos of me was "spot," because of a spot being round like an orgasm face (which I hate talking about) and also because of my having acne, which was on my back and probably visible in the illegal videos that were filmed of me with hidden cameras in the shower during the months that I was at a homeless shelter in Vermont in 2011. I have since taken Accutane, which improved my skin; it would be nice if there were Internet Accutane to remove illegal videos. I guess there is; it's called money that I don't have.
During the years that "spot" was a conglomerate code word, my blogs were WordPress blogs. I finally stopped writing at WordPress because I couldn't stop online stalkers from writing to me at WordPress blogs and also because Blogger was easier to publish from my phone. There are people who write abusive messages to the YouTube channel that's part of every Google account for each Blogger blog, but I'm able to stop them individually from writing to me after they write, and each one would have to start another Google account and YouTube channel to be able to write to me again. There seem to be restrictions for them doing that, which wasn't what WordPress was like. All a stalker had to do to stalk me at a WordPress blog was to create another email address. There was a stalker that I had for a couple of years who wrote thousands of abusive messages; within minutes of my blocking one of his email accounts, he'd start another one and write more abusive messages. He called places to try to get me fired from work or to otherwise try to get me forced to leave. He berated me every day, calling me mentally ill and ugly and jealous of celebrities whom he said had no idea who I was, while he showed from things that he wrote that he knew I wasn't delusional and that he was trying to get positive attention from the conglomerate. He ridiculed me for being homeless. He wasn't lewd, the way the other person who stalked me for a couple of years at WordPress blogs was, but he was horribly abusive.
I finally went to the police, when the lewd stalker seemed to be seriously threatening to stalk me in person. The lewd stalker seemed to stop writing to me when he was contacted by the police. The stalker who obsessed about calling me mentally ill took a few weeks to leave me alone; he denied that the police had contacted him. He actually wrote me one message several months ago at a YouTube blog; I deleted it and blocked him, and he hasn't written to me again.
That's the address for the pages of results at YouTube for a search at YouTube of "zoxim." Many of the videos that I filmed of messages that he wrote to me at my WordPress blogs are there.
Because my blogs have gotten censored, totally disabled, at times since I started writing about the conglomerate in 2010, I usually write at a blog for a while and then stop publishing at that blog and start another one. Frequently, YouTube has disabled videos that I have published about being harassed and/or stalked; it then gives strikes to the blog that had the video, warning me that more strikes will cause the entire blog to be disabled. One such video was of a man who clearly almost hit me; he didn't do it, but he obviously was about to hit me.
That's the address of a video called "02/05/14: YouTube and WordPress have both destroyed past blogs that I have had." I used to write the date at the beginning of each video that I published at YouTube.
When I started to write at Blogger, I was concerned that the Blogger addresses automatically had the word "spot."
For the Blogger blog "Things I Wrote," I called the part of the address for the blog that I could do something about "thingsiwrotecantfixendofthisaddress."
This is the address for a page from it:
The conglomerate, as it typically does, has ignored that there was nothing that I could do about the part of the address that Blogger gives to people's blogs. Every page that I published at "Things I Wrote" is at the address that was part something I could do something about and part wasn't. The conglomerate would rather hack my phone, take a word that I type that has nothing to do with anybody, interpret the word the way that it wants to so that it can start another rumor about me, and obsess about it for years, attacking me all that time as if I did something wrong, than to listen to and respect something that I have said or written every day about what I really think.
There are so many conglomerate code words and symbols that nobody who didn't know for years that the conglomerate was happening could know them all; even people who are part of the conglomerate or who were protesting against it for years frequently don't know them all, but I think that the Washington Post knows a lot of them, since it uses many of them to promote crime every day. I know that Liz Seccuro won't know about the history of "spot" until I publish this page, and that she's only trying to support me against the Washington Post with her Tweet from July 3, 2016.
I wrote my code policies because the conglomerate was attacking me about every page that I wrote; those policies don't really stop the conglomerate's attacks and misinterpretations, but they have stopped some of them.
I think it's probable that the Washington Post used Dr. Gallagher's article about mental illness and demonic possession as code to try to say yet another horrible thing about me, even if that's not what Dr. Gallagher was trying to do.
This is another picture of Dr. Gallagher's artice:
Demonic possession is more believable than rape? Isn't that what the Washington Post is saying?
Has anyone at the Washington Post read Chapter 10 of Liz Seccuro's book about being gang-raped at the Phi Kappa Psi house at the University of Virginia in 1984? It's about one written account after another and numerous sound witnesses, all of which could not get convictions because the guilty men and the organizations that protect them are too powerful.
The conglomerate has often encouraged people who have stalked me online or who are abusive about me at blogs that they start to ridicule me. Not everything that they say gets taken by the conglomerate and used to attack me; however, I think that someone who called my blogs "a treasure trove of crazy" got noticed by the conglomerate, which mentioned it a few times.
That's the address for the results for a Google search of the term "lena kochman treasure trove of crazy."
I thought about that when I read T. Rees Shapiro's July 2, 2016 article called "'Our worst nightmare': New legal filings detail reporting of Rolling Stone's U-Va. gang rape story," in which Mr. Shapiro was totally misleading about the documents which were filed by Ms. Erdely in support of Rolling Stone's motion for summary judgment.
A quote from that article is:
"Among the trove of douments released Friday evening are Erdely's 431 pages of notes that she used to build her story."
I can't know if Mr. Shapiro was being snide when he wrote that sentence.
Ms. Erdely is a professional journalist. I'm not a professional journalist, nor have I ever pretended or implied that I was. I am a citizen of the United States, and I have the right to free speech, which I don't abuse to try to hurt people for no reason.
As happened when the Washington Post began attacking the Rolling Stone article as soon as it was published in 2014, other media have mindlessly supported the Washington Post and accepted its portrayal as the truth.
That's a picture from today of part of the first page of results for a Google search of the term "university of virginia rolling stone."
I don't create anything about the addresses that videos get when I publish them at YouTube; they are automatically given addresses by YouTube. I say that every day at my Preliminary page.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, July 5, 2016 @ 2:45 p.m./edited, with additions, @ 4:49 p.m.
