Those are a picture of the first paragraph of the CNN article to which the other CNN article is linked by the words "has confirmed," and the address for the article.
Why not appoint the special prosecutor, mentioned in the first CNN article which I have quoted?
Innocent until proven guilty. The media does not have the right to decide who's going to be the President, but it seems to me that the media thinks it has that right. The media wants to force this President to resign, but there are laws about that.
The hysteria about President Trump is hurting the country. It's frightening people who feel like our government is out of control. It's hurting the ability of the United States to function domestically and everywhere else. It's harming the reputation of the United States as a country that is capable of anything other than turmoil. It is, to be honest, making a perilous case for media censorship, since the media is much less interested in reporting facts than in media momentum to promote sales.
My life has depended on the right of free speech since the conglomerate, mostly goaded by the media, formed around bullying me in 2010. The media has abused the right to free speech and the right to a free press for 7 years, and for who knows how long before that?
If the frenzy around the Trump administration can be reduced to a single line of inquiry, and if that line of inquiry can be conducted by a special prosecutor, then that is who should be appointed to address the concerns about the election. It's a test of the President; he'll pass or he'll fail, but the harassment of the White House has to stop.
The media was harassing President Obama in 2010, before he joined the conglomerate. The media likes to harass people.
I don't choose excerpts or supporting information for code purposes.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, May 17, 2017 @ 11:24 a.m./No code, all policies operative, all the time. I'll publish my preliminary page and similar pages again.
