I took their pictures so that I could identify them to school administrators, who spent six months last year denying knowing the identity of the student who harassed me in my Chinese class, until he was so encouraged by the school's defense of him that he started to harass me online. The school did nothing to confront him until then.
Trying to ask the male students who harassed me in my math class to stop was as futile as asking that student last year to stop; they laughed, acted like I was crazy, and did not stop harassing me. Taking their pictures near the end of class last night and then leaving was the last resort. One of them tried to grab my phone when I took his picture.
There are a lot of people of color at my school, so how do you explain that most of them don't harass me, and that I have no problems with them, if I'm racist or they're racist?
Also, what's this about?
That's a picture of part of first page of the New York Times' website today.
Why has the New York Times stopped accusing me of being a racist about the male student who harassed me in my Chinese class last year? Does the newspaper have new favorites, more abusers whom it plans to portray as being my victims?
I have asked this question before; why would I have taken Chinese and Spanish last year if I'm racist? Do you think those classes are usually part of a xenophobe's curriculum? They weren't required for my academic program. I probably won't take Chinese again at this school; I could, but I don't want to risk having to interact with the bully or the people who enabled him. I'm being denied access to equal education; his lies about me could have had me thrown out of school. I'm sure that he read everything that he could about me on the Internet, saw that the conglomerate assumed that I had provoked him or was lying and that the conglomerate portrayed him as a hero, and he wanted to exploit me to be famous and to meet rich and famous people.
I'll be homeless in less than a month; the New York Times and everyone else who illegally watches me in my home is lying by omission about the voyeurism. To deflect from their abuse of me, I'm sure they'll all want to seize upon my being harassed at school to say that I'm lying.
That's the address of a video at my current YouTube blog that the New York Times illegally saw me watch in my apartment last night, talking about how I "used" to take psychiatric medication.
That's a picture of part of the first page of the New York Times' website today.
The New York Times knows that I take prescription medication; it has attacked me for taking that medication for the year that I have lived at this apartment. If I didn't take it, it would be difficult for me to sleep in front of all the people who illegally watch me in the apartment.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, May 2, 2017 @ 12:47 p.m./No code, all policies operative, all the time. I'll publish my preliminary page and similar pages again.
