Saturday, April 30, 2016

The White House promotes sexual abuse, including child molestation, voyeurism and involuntary pornography, and probably hacks my phone, while Edward Snowden can't get pardoned?

April 30, 2016


My privacy is criminally violated 24 hours a day, by so many individuals and organizations that I'll never know who they all are.  The people who do it think it's HYSTERICALLY funny, and use what they say about those violations as excuses to never stop violating me.

The media has not stopped promoting sexual abuse, including child molestation, voyeurism and involuntary pornography, for years.  For its own amusement, and to make my life as painful, isolated and ostracized as possible, it criminally invades my privacy in every way to which it has access, and encourages others also to treat me as if I have no rights.  How many crime-promoting articles and stories have gotten published, at the front pages of the paper copies and the websites of major newspapers and during television broadcasts?  The media would rather do that than try to help Mr. Snowden end his exile?

Because of the conglomerate, all women and all students around the world are at risk of sexual abuse at and outside school, including sexual harassment, physical sexual abuse, voyeurism and involuntary pornography.  

Because of the conglomerate, harassment and stalking are perpetrated not only by individuals and corporations, but also by government employees.  

Because of the conglomerate, nobody is safe from voyeurism and involuntary pornography, anywhere in the world.  A person's protection from those human rights abuses is directly proportionate to his or her wealth.  Democracy is supposed to be a form of government which refutes the idea that people have to buy their rights.  

Since the conglomerate began to promote sexual abuse in 2010, sex offenders have gotten taken off sex offender registries in droves.  Rapists have gotten awarded millions of dollars.  Edward Snowden can't get pardoned for telling people that their government has jeopardized their rights?

Not everyone who would like to distribute classified information to the public has altruistic, patriotic motives; it seems that Mr. Snowden did. 

Why did all the people who have died to defend democracy die, so that criminal violations by the powerful of the privacy of law-abiding citizens could be a ceaseless, public, dirty joke that makes the targets' quality of life as low as possible and elevates their risk of rape and murder to a near-certainty for the rest of their lives?

Copyright L. Kochman, April 30, 2016 @ 4:47 p.m.