Wednesday, March 29, 2017

How many people with disabilities is the New York Times going to exploit to promote sexual crime?

March 29, 2017

Also, what about all of the articles that the New York Times didn't write while Mr. Obama was President, when the Obama administration was contemporary to an unprecedented number of shootings and domestic mass murders?  Several of those incidents had nothing to do with terrorism and were only the result of the social fabric fraying from neglect and from the conglomerate's promotion of crime, including the hunting of human beings.  

Bullying someone almost to death, encouraging people to promote criminal violations against the target's privacy; that's what the New York Times is calling an appropriate "rite of passage" for young people?



That's a picture of part of the first page of the New York Times' website.

This article has nothing to do with jobs being replaced specifically for the people who lose their jobs when fossil fuel production is stopped:




You're not talking about each person who loses work being given another job, at the same salary, at a place equidistant from home to the place where he or she used to work, where all of the people with whom he or she has worked for years will also be, utilizing the knowledge that they have.  What's being said to those people by anyone, nothing?  Environmentalists feel like all of those people should just be happy to be part of the cause of stopping climate change, and that they should applaud the people who are working in morally superior industries somewhere else?  

This is at the top of the first page of the New York Times' website:




The implication that President Trump is the Climate Change Ogre by contrast to President Obama is repeated later:





This is a picture of part of the article called "Trump's Move to Revive Coal Won't Halt Rise of Its Rivals":




"Economic realities."  Poor President Obama had "economic realities" to deal with, unlike any other President, which the media and the rest of the conglomerate felt it would be burdensomely demanding of him for anyone to discuss in detail every week from 2010 to the present?  

Notwithstanding the global hypocrisy of the media about comparing these Presidents, it's an informative article and I hope that the Trump administration and everyone else who's part of government will read it.  




Copyright L. Kochman, March 29, 2017 @ 11:55 a.m.