Woods-Mullen Shelter Is A Crime Against Humanity: October 2016

Monday, October 31, 2016

American Express is promoting voyeurism, involuntary pornography and child molestation.

November 1, 2016

That's a picture of part of an email that American Express sent me today.

I have to have a credit card, like I have to have a bank account. I had never had a credit card until a couple of years ago, when landlords and realtors were telling me that my credit wasn't high enough to rent an apartment. I didn't have bad credit, but I had never had a car or a car loan or anything that would have started a credit history for me. After a while of responsibly using the credit card, I was able to get an apartment.

Since I had to leave school, my loans from college are out of deferment, I am paying off a bill that I got from leaving school, and I am attempting to get work. I am paying for my living expenses with the credit card, which I have never had to do before.

I can't stop banks or credit card businesses from promoting crime, but I can protest against them doing that and maybe they'll stop, or someone will stop the world takeover by evil.

I don't know why these things are happening; I have never seen anything so sick in my life, nor did I ever think that what has happened for almost 7 years could happen.

Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, November 1, 2016 @ 2:11 a.m./I'll publish my preliminary page and similar pages again soon.

Has the Department of Children and Families thought about investigating Justin Timberlake, his wife, and all of the other celebrities and famous people who have promoted child abuse?

The movie "Trolls" is another sick Hollywood joke.

October 31, 2016

The movie is ostensibly for children.

The conglomerate stole the rainbow from gay people and perverted it to promote child molestation; that's happened since at least 2012, if not late in 2011.

Characters named after trees are a reference to my being victimized by voyeurism during the one date that I had in 2010. I didn't know that people were following me with cameras 24 hours a day to get whatever video of me they could sell or use to ridicule me in some way. That's what all the conglomerate's "tree" and "park" jokes are about; my being in a park, at night, where I thought I was alone with someone. Near the end of the date, I had my back against a tree and the person I was with had his hand in my pants until I had an orgasm, and THAT'S SOMETHING THAT HOLLYWOOD THINKS IS APPROPRIATE TO TURN INTO A JOKE IN A CHILDREN'S MOVIE, BY CALLING ONE OF THE CHARACTERS "BRANCH."

"Princess Poppy" is a joke about "popping" virgins and specifically children. That's also been a conglomerate joke for years. The theme of royalty was also used to promote child molestation for a few years.

I hate having to describe how the conglomerate has dehumanized me over and over again, but if I don't talk about it, people won't know.

That one date in 2010 was the last time that I was physically intimate with another person, and I wouldn't have gotten that intimate with that person at all if the conglomerate hadn't already tortured me with sexual harassment for months by then. I was miserable, angry, depressed and terrified of the conglomerate's power. I was totally alone with what the conglomerate was doing to me and what I knew the conglomerate was planning to do to the world.

The conglomerate was ecstatic to get the lewd video of me and hasn't stopped talking about it since. The conglomerate likes to use that video and references to it to prove that I'm a nymphomaniac, although the date started hours before the part of the video that the conglomerate has viciously obsessed about and publicized; the other person and I had known each other a few years before, and when we saw each other that day, we started talking. We weren't being exhibitionists; we thought we were alone, which the person or people who videotaped us knew and didn't care, and which the video probably shows to anyone who hasn't already bought the conglomerate's slurs against me.

I haven't seen the video, which has probably circulated among hundreds, if not thousands, of people, and is probably online somewhere, with all of the other hateful video that the conglomerate has filmed of me wherever it could get it; the bathrooms and showers of homeless shelters and psychiatric units, gym locker rooms, my own home. I don't know if I'll ever feel safe using a toilet or taking a shower without the lights off ever again in my life.

No amount of loneliness has gotten me to touch or be touched by another person since that date in 2010, but the conglomerate hasn't stopped calling me a slut who deserves what's happening to me.

The conglomerate has ruined my ability to have a normal life at all, and the horrible people who continue to tell the world what a bad person I am are liars who want to make people think that I deserve what's happening to me, and that I'm such a slut that nobody should listen to me when I say "YOU CAN'T HAVE SEX WITH CHILDREN!

The character "Creek" is also a degrading joke. The last person that I had sex with, when I was 29, apparently started a rumor that I was so aroused when I was with him that I had a lot of vaginal lubricant. That's what all the conglomerate jokes about everything that's wet are about; that's what the Wet Floor signs and Caution cones strewn around the world are about. There's a joke about it on the front page of The Boston Globe today.

I am one of the most viciously persecuted people who has ever lived. Most people would already be dead from suicide if they'd been treated like this, but the conglomerate not only doesn't care that my life is being ruined, the conglomerate continues to victim-blame me for the conglomerate's abuse of me, while the conglomerate promotes the rape of children.

If you have no previous knowledge of something, you're not going to think of it as a factor for anything.

October 31, 2016

I didn't know anything about celebrity before 2010.

I didn't know that there are people who get paid to be voyeurs and who don't care how many people they hurt.

I didn't know what the media was like.

I never even had a blog before 2010.

Sadomasochism was never part of my sex life or relationships, or of the sex lives or relationships of people whom I knew. I didn't know anything about it, and had never thought about it. It's not the sort of relationship that I have ever chosen, and I don't think it's healthy.

This woman gets paid to write?

October 31, 2016

That's a picture of the last paragraph of this article, which is at the first page of results for a Google search of the term "uva rolling stone":

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/melissa-mullins/2016/10/30/rolling-stone-publisher-offers-tepid-apology-false-uva-rape

These cars are parked across the street from a grade school.

October 31, 2016

Sunday, October 30, 2016

"Hitler went after the wrong people."

October 31, 2016

That's a quote from a message that someone sent to one of my past YouTube blogs, "Lena Kochman Boston," over the past few days.

These are pictures of messages people have sent to that blog:

Does anyone at the White House know that the 10th anniversary of the Amish school shooting was this October?

October 30, 2016

These are pictures of the first page of the White House's official website:

These are pictures of part of the page that corresponds with the section for "The Kid Science Advisors":

The gunman who shot all those Amish children in 2006 would have raped them if he'd had time.

I'll never understand President Obama, why he doesn't care about people, and why the enjoyment of causing fear for no reason is part of his administration.

How to make money when you retire if you are a bad person

October 30, 2016

This was in the same aisle:

A lot of people from Boston have been victimized by voyeurism since 2011, and the conglomerate continues to act as if I'm the only target and that I asked for or deserve what is happening.

https://youtu.be/Hiq-pOxD324

Some of the things that happened today

October 30, 2016

This car is parked on my street:

Every student and employee at MIT is at risk of sexual harassment, voyeurism, involuntary pornography and rape.

The President of MIT wants child rape to be legal.

October 30, 2016

All of the pictures are from today.

This is a picture of part of the first page of the MIT website:

These are pictures of the page about the President of MIT at the MIT website:

I don't want to date you, Mr. Pattinson, but I don't think your relationship is good for you.

October 30, 2016

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7UhFzTWxzBo

I don't know what people will say about my choosing that clip from "Divergent." A lot, probably.

I think it must be difficult to leave a sadomasochistic relationship.

October 30, 2016

I have never had one, but I think it must be daunting to consider trying to leave that type of relationship, because not only do the people who have that type of relationship show their vulnerabilities to each other, they mutually participate in the abuse of those vulnerabilities. It seems logical that their emotions would interlock in a system of power exchanges rather than nurturance.

Famous people are particularly vulnerable to being exposed.

Robert Pattinson

October 30, 2016

I don't want to date you, but I'm sorry if I encouraged you to be in a relationship that I didn't realize is unhealthy.

There is a real first name for "Drew" that's known by some of the media, isn't there?

October 30, 2016

Not many people seem to be talking about that. Also, nobody seems to be saying that his full name should be disclosed to the public, and I'm not suggesting that it should be.

My objections to being enslaved are the impetus for most of the abuse. I haven't sold myself to anything, as my modest lifestyle attests.

October 30, 2016

That's a picture of part of the Incorporated website.

Ben Affeck and Matt Damon seem to be obsessed with making the world think that I'm a bad person.

October 30, 2016

My not wanting to sleep with them is not a reason for them to abuse me; neither is my criticism of them.

"Spiga Biotech" is the name of the evil corporation in a television series produced by Mr. Affleck and Mr. Damon that premieres on November 30, 2016. Is the date of the premiere a concession to the idea that it's grotesque that these men and their industry never stop bullying me?

"Spiga" as in "spigot"? What about Mr. Damon's clean water activism? Has he tired of using his activism as a joke to persecute me and degrade women?

Before I started at Bunker Hill Community College, I had spent two years trying to get into a biotechnology program, because I wanted to be qualified to work at a livable wage. I hoped that I could take my biotechnology degree from Bunker Hill and work while I attended a school to get the 4-year degree that I spent all of grade school studying to get and which one painful and traumatic problem after another has prevented me from getting for 20 years.

For two years in a row, I was not accepted by a free biotechnology training program, despite my high scores on placement tests. Mr. Affleck has hacked my phone for years, and Mr. Damon probably continues to do that also, so they know that I spent months studying math and chemistry while I was trying to get into a program.

The conglomerate's abuse of me prevented me from getting into one program after another. I wrote the truth on the applications that asked for my work history, which is that I have repeatedly gotten harassed at work, lied to and lied about and called crazy when I object to being abused, and fired. The Internet search results for my name are full of hateblogs by people calling me "crazy feminist b----," "paranoid schizophrenic," "c---," and other things to that effect, and would cause any employer not to want to hire me.

I was harassed out of Bunker Hill by harassment and lies, by the adminstration's suspicion and distrust of me, and by the administration's failure to address the abuse to which I was subjected. It is improbable that Bunker Hill would have gotten the attention that it did from the government if I were never a student there, but once I was a student there, the school was given unprecedented amounts of money, millions of dollars, despite, and maybe because of, how badly I was treated.

The protagonist of "Incorporated" is called Ben, and the premise of the series is, yet again, the quest of a man to "save the woman he loves." I don't know when Mr. Affleck or anyone else who has stalked me for what is probably a decade will realize that he's the problem.

It also seems to me that the entertainment industry is as corporate as any industry.

I have never regretted Justin Timberlake's marriage to someone else.

October 30, 2016

I don't know if Jimmy Fallon is married; if he is, I hope his wife will be all right.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vJLiqR0rVDE

That's the address of a Tonight Show video that was published on October 26, 2016.

I want The New York Times to stop all criminal invasions of my privacy.

Forgiveness isn't the refusal to recognize evil, nor is it license to continue to commit evil.

October 30, 2016

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O_fWFVBTCD8

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rO5-3sfwOIA

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8UuEdP6jK90

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rn-CsbWJrII

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tqV7CVTuNGM

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XcrdpiIt0-M

Those are the addresses for videos at YouTube of Helen Whitney talking about her 2011 film "Forgiveness: A Time to Love and a Time to Hate."

I don't configure the addresses of YouTube videos.

Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, October 30, 2016 @ 11:03 a.m./I will publish my preliminary page and similar pages again soon.

Friday, October 28, 2016

Thank you to all of the police officers who are investigating rape at American colleges and universities and who are arresting felony criminals.

October 28, 2016

I have no career or dependents and I don't have a lot of personal risk for writing about what people ought to do about sexual assault.

I hope that the criminal justice system and the government will support you. I know the media won't; I'm sorry.

Couldn't the media do something every day to help abducted children and teenagers?

My impression of Emily Renda is that she's a nice person.

October 28, 2016

Ms. Erdely was more discerning about several people whom she was able to interview for the article than they knew she would be; all of them now have a personal interest in making her pay for her objectivity in the court of public opinion.

I also think that it ought to be obvious to everyone that the University of Virginia was, and is planning to continue to be, villainous with or without Ms. Eramo.

I think that people should stop attacking Jackie; particularly the older adults need to stop blaming her to get out of their predicament.

These are my thoughts today about the University of Virginia and Rolling Stone.

I think that my stress levels are high enough, about my situation, the conglomerate and this case, that it could be that I should respect how upset I am and try to leave things to the professionals, at least for the weekend.

Before I try to do that, I want to quote the Rolling Stone article:

"S. Daniel Carter, who as former director of public policy for the advocacy group Clery Center for Security on Campus is a national expert on college safety, points out that UVA's sexual assault problems are not much worse than other schools; if anything, he says, the depressing reality is that UVA's situation is likely the norm. Decades of awareness programming haven't budged the prevalence of campus rape: One in five women is sexually assaulted in college, though only about 12 percent report it to police."

Nobody has the right to abuse me.

October 28, 2016

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being beautiful.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being ugly.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being young.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being old.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being smart.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being stupid.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being fat.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being thin.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for the color of my hair, my eyes or my skin.

Nobody has the right to abuse me because of his or her assumptions about what I'm like.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for my gender.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being poor.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for being rich.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for my race.

Nobody has the right to abuse me for my religion.

Nobody has the right to abuse me about my sex life.

Nobody has the right to abuse me because of "what everyone says" about me.

Nobody has the right to abuse me to make people laugh.

Nobody has the right to abuse me to make people feel afraid.

Nobody has the right to abuse me to make money.

Nobody has the right to abuse me to get elected or to stay in office.

Nobody has the right to abuse me because I can't stop the abuse.

NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO ABUSE ME!

The New York Times is a mob of rabid animals every day.

October 28, 2016

The New York Times is one of the most respected media sources in the world, yet The New York Times of 2016 is a mob of rabid animals.

What's happening is the implosion of civilization.

It will be another week before I know whether or not I have cervical cancer.

October 28, 2016

I don't know when the conglomerate might stop bullying me and promoting crime.

Some of the things that happened today

October 28, 2016

822 LV7

Wet Floor signs all over the post office. I was at the post office a few days ago, and there were no Wet Floor signs. Today, one of the signs was in front of the machine where I PAID MONEY to buy stamps, the last time that I was at the post office.

No matter how much people seem to hate me and want me to feel degraded, they never seem to think that they shouldn't take money from me. They seem to think that everything about me is polluted except the money that gets magically clean when they take it.

The New York Times WANTS TO KILL WOMEN, TO LEGALIZE RAPE AND TO CRIMINALIZE THE REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION OF RAPE!

October 28, 2016

This is how The New York Times has responded to the allegations against a University of Wisconsin student; by publishing a story to discredit people who are raped and to encourage the idea that college men who are accused of rape are victims:

___________________________________

That picture is not of a section of the first page that is contiguous to these sections, but the New York Times has placed the story about a rape acquittal before the story about the University of Wisconsin student.

___________________________________

Those are pictures of contiguous parts of the first page of the New York Times's website.

There is no color that the New York Times could turn that picture of porn that would turn the picture into something that the New York Times should have published, and there is nothing that excuses the Times's promotion of crime.

Nothing else about the first page of the website has changed since this morning; not the promotion of child rape, voyeurism, involuntary pornography, or targeting the Democratic Presidential for sexual abuse.

Apparently, The New York Times wants the rest of the world to sexually ridicule Mrs. Clinton and couldn't care less if the Times's reporting about her loses her, and the UNITED STATES, the respect of the world. Apparently, The New York Times thinks that portraying Mrs. Clinton as weak and silly is what the United States needs to ensure the safety of U.S. citizens and U.S. allies.

This is a picture of a CBS article:

That is ONE OF the sexual assaults of which the University of Wisconsin student is accused.

HOW DID HE ASSAULT SO MANY WOMEN BEFORE THE SCHOOL DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT?!

This is the address for the CBS article:

https://www.google.com/amp/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/alec-cook-university-of-wisconsin-student-accused-in-string-of-sex-assaults/

The Rolling Stone article isn't discrediting rape victims; media like the New York Times WANT TO DISCREDIT RAPE VICTIMS. THEY WANT TO LEGALIZE RAPE AND TO PERSECUTE RAPE VICTIMS!

The way that the media have attacked the Rolling Stone article has given colleges everywhere an excuse for not investigating allegations of assault. That's why the article was attacked, whether or not every naive reporter who was part of the attacks knew that was the media's goal; it never had anything to do with stopping rape. It was always about discrediting rape victims, ruining the careers of journalists who want to help rape victims, and sending the message of guaranteed retribution to anyone who thinks about helping rape victims and confronting perpertrators.

Medical privacy is a serious issue for a lot of people.

October 28, 2016

The conglomerate never talks about that, probably because the conglomerate is too busy enjoying the destruction of privacy rights to care.

This is the address for the first page of results at a YouTube search for the term "medical privacy conference."

https://m.youtube.com/results?q=medical%20privacy%20conference&sm=3

The conglomerate's attitude about medical privacy seems to be "What the public, and even medical practitioners, don't know about how secure medical information isn't won't hurt the conglomerate."

I don't treat ANYONE the way that the conglomerate has treated me for almost 7 years.

October 28, 2016

I have never treated anyone the way that I'm treated, and I would never treat anyone like this.

Is the last part of that sentence something that the conglomerate thinks is a lie? Is that why the conglomerate has no remorse about what's happening to me?

Does the conglomerate think that the only reason that I get angry at the conglomerate is that I wish that I had the power to hurt people that the conglomerate does? What if the conglomerate never thinks about things in terms of right and wrong, rather than in terms of who has the power to oppress another person?

I'm not hacking anyone's phone or email, electronically monitoring people's purchases or where they are. I'm not watching lewd video of people that was illegally filmed of them in places where they had the right to privacy or that was only filmed of them by people who surreptitiously followed them to get whatever they could on camera with the goal of humiliating them. I'm not threatening people's ability to work or their safety. I don't encourage people to abuse others, or threaten them if they don't want to abuse others. I don't spitefully ruin the worthwhile things that people manage to do, even if I don't personally like those people and the things that they do that aren't worthwhile. I don't ruin people's ability to have social lives or safe housing. I don't viciously propagate rumors about people.

I don't spend my time thinking of things that I could do or say to make other people feel bad or to get the world to ridicule and hate them. I get angry, and I'm not perfect, but I don't try to make people miserable or ruin their lives.

I don't know when the ADULTS who have targeted me for their ADULT BULLYING will stop acting like I did something to deserve their abuse. They have a million excuses, none of which they would have exploited for years if they didn't LIKE bullying people, and if they weren't totally desensitized to bullying me.

Steven Soderbergh directed the movie "Out of Sight."

October 28, 2016

I saw the movie several years ago; was there a moral to the story that I didn't get?

Suspending judgment about other people does not seem to be one of the entertainment industry's fortes.

October 28, 2016

I don't know if that's because so many people who are part of that industry feel entitled to be paid millions of dollars from the attention of the public without having their public behavior subjected to criticism, or if the scrutiny to which they are subjected makes them eager to spend their time tarnishing other people's reputations.

Nice, healthy women perhaps don't get paid by the entertainment industry.

October 28, 2016

No matter how much talent, intelligence or idealism they have when they start, they seem to get the message about where the finish line is and how to get there.

That's a picture of the first part of the first page of results for a Google search of the term "oceans 8 movie cast."

The movie is filming now.

Women are being harassed, stalked, raped and murdered around the world every day: I'm at page 10 and this report hasn't talked about that yet.

October 28, 2016

These are pictures of parts of the first several pages of a report called "The Ms. Factor: The Power of Female Driven Content." According to the title page, it was published in 2015 by The Producers Guild of America Women's Impact Network and Women and Hollywood."

The pictures of noncontiguous parts of the report are separated by dark lines and by what I wrote about them.

___________________________________

The people who wrote the report thought that Cate Blanchett, speaking about a film written and directed by a child rapist, was an approriate person to quote?

Why doesn't Woody Allen ever have trouble getting financing, getting people to act in his movies, and getting people to work for him?

___________________________________

This is a stubborn prejudice that causes a lot of problems; the idea that women are very different from men. Women tend to be treated differently than men, both by men and by women, and that is why we have "different life experiences," but that quote and, so far, the entire report, say nothing about how women are treated differently.

___________________________________

She has to die.

She has to kill people.

She has to be a child who is sickeningly degraded, sexually and in every other way.

Is that what the report is saying a female character has to do to be the lead or a lead of a financially sucessful movie?

I haven't seen "The Fault in Our Stars."

I have read "The Hunger Games" books and seen the first and last Hunger Games movies.

I haven't seen most of "The Exorcist." I know some of what happens in the movie.

The Hunger Games books are not only about a female protagonist; they are also about the merger of totalitarianism, consumerism and the media and entertainment industry. The first Hunger Games book describes that merger in every chapter; the movie doesn't. Although the last Hunger Games movie illustrates the media manipulation of Catniss's image by a leader who is ultimately shown to be corrupt, that leader is a female leader whom Catniss kills.

The themes of the Hunger Games books, of political systems that use fear to retain control over populations, of people being forced to turn against each other for their own survival, of people who seek power for their own gain rather than for the good of others, of the bankrupt morality of a world where cruelty, violence and death are staged, filmed and advertised as entertainment; from the Hunger Games movies that I saw, those themes were not as pronounced as the elaborately choreographed "action." From "action guy" to "action girl" is not asking much of the audience; neither is the ending to the film series, in which the female protagonist has seemingly traded all of her former mobility for sitting outside with her husband and children. All or nothing, once again; from war to passive peace. The end of the last movie could be interpreted as a message from Hollywood that the only reason that women ever raise their voices about anything is so that they can have some quiet time.

I haven't read the entire report; maybe it talks about something other than money later.

This is the address for it:

http://www.producersguild.org/resource/resmgr/WIN/ms_factor_090115_01.pdf

"Stop talking and send nude pictures, woman."

October 28, 2016

Men who own the corporations pay for the advertising and other financing; is that accurate?

If it's accurate, is that also why so much hasn't changed, despite the membership of the Producers Guild of America being almost 50% female?

These are pictures of part of an article that was published in 2014:

This is another picture of part of the article:

It took almost 20 years for the percentage of women serving as Board members in the United States to get from 10% to not even 20%? That's not to mention how many of those women don't chair those boards.

The title of this page is not a quote; it's my paraphrase of what seems to be the mantra of the world's power structure.

This is the address for that article:

http://www.producersguild.org/blogpost/923036/183878/PGA-Women-s-Impact-Network-Stepping-Up-To-Set-The-Agenda-For-Change