If they were, Mr. Shapiro would have reported that immediately, months ago, and the media that has attacked the Rolling Stone article never would have stopped talking about it.
That's a picture of part of a Washington Post article by Mr. Shapiro that was published yesterday.
"Not credible" is also not a statement that the other alleged victims are not real people; what it seems to mean is that the University of Virginia is denying that those women were assaulted, or that Mr. Shapiro is saying that the University of Virginia is denying that those women were assaulted. Mr. Groves's specific, descriptive language in court does not seem to be quoted by Mr. Shapiro.
These are pictures of contiguous sections of part of Ms. Erdely's June 30, 2016 court filing:
Who were the "'two staff people'...trying to bring the two women forward anonymously'"?
Doesn't it sound like there were several conversations between employees of the University of Virginia and those two other alleged victims?
Whoever those women are, they are too frightened by what's happening to Jackie to tell anyone anything, as Jackie is too frightened to say anything definite about anything. She's already been called a liar about everything, and that is the story that is accepted and propagated about her by the media that sought to discredit the Rolling Stone article as soon as it was published. Why would she say, as part of a filmed deposition used as evidence in a lawsuit against Rolling Stone, anything that could be used by Ms. Eramo's legal team and then Phi Kappa Psi to name her as a codefendant with Ms. Erdely and Rolling Stone? Jackie was forced to give the deposition, over the objections of Jackie's attorneys. It wasn't a deposition whose goal was to get the truth about whether she was raped; the goal of the deposition was to get her to incriminate herself, Ms. Erdely and Rolling Stone as having knowingly told damaging lies to the public.
Jackie can't tell the truth, because the University of Virginia and the Charlottesville Police Department are lying. She could get sued and possibly arrested for telling the truth now.
If she had told the truth in the deposition, every media source that has spent almost 2 years attacking her would have published articles saying that she was lying. She couldn't say anything in the deposition other than that she couldn't remember.
This is the address of Mr. Shapiro's article, called "U-Va. attorney asked 'Jackie' to disavow Rolling Stone rape article":
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, October 27, 2016 @ 8:58 p.m.
