This is how The New York Times has responded to the allegations against a University of Wisconsin student; by publishing a story to discredit people who are raped and to encourage the idea that college men who are accused of rape are victims:
___________________________________
That picture is not of a section of the first page that is contiguous to these sections, but the New York Times has placed the story about a rape acquittal before the story about the University of Wisconsin student.
___________________________________
Those are pictures of contiguous parts of the first page of the New York Times's website.
There is no color that the New York Times could turn that picture of porn that would turn the picture into something that the New York Times should have published, and there is nothing that excuses the Times's promotion of crime.
Nothing else about the first page of the website has changed since this morning; not the promotion of child rape, voyeurism, involuntary pornography, or targeting the Democratic Presidential for sexual abuse.
Apparently, The New York Times wants the rest of the world to sexually ridicule Mrs. Clinton and couldn't care less if the Times's reporting about her loses her, and the UNITED STATES, the respect of the world. Apparently, The New York Times thinks that portraying Mrs. Clinton as weak and silly is what the United States needs to ensure the safety of U.S. citizens and U.S. allies.
This is a picture of a CBS article:
That is ONE OF the sexual assaults of which the University of Wisconsin student is accused.
HOW DID HE ASSAULT SO MANY WOMEN BEFORE THE SCHOOL DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT?!
This is the address for the CBS article:
The Rolling Stone article isn't discrediting rape victims; media like the New York Times WANT TO DISCREDIT RAPE VICTIMS. THEY WANT TO LEGALIZE RAPE AND TO PERSECUTE RAPE VICTIMS!
The way that the media have attacked the Rolling Stone article has given colleges everywhere an excuse for not investigating allegations of assault. That's why the article was attacked, whether or not every naive reporter who was part of the attacks knew that was the media's goal; it never had anything to do with stopping rape. It was always about discrediting rape victims, ruining the careers of journalists who want to help rape victims, and sending the message of guaranteed retribution to anyone who thinks about helping rape victims and confronting perpertrators.
Copyright, with noted exceptions, L. Kochman, October 28, 2016 @ 1:17 p.m.
