He was the impetus for the erroneous discrediting of the Rolling Stone article. The prestige of the shockingly misogynist Washington Post and of the shockingly uninformed Columbia Journalism Review intimidated Rolling Stone and set the tone for every other media attack on that article.
His articles are full of mistakes, some of which seem to be intentionally misleading. Nobody talks about that, other than me, and the Washington Post is still publishing the same things, ignoring all of the evidence that Jackie was telling the truth.
Isn't there no evidence that the two other women sexually assaulted by Phi Kappa Psi members are not real women, Mr. Shapiro? Did you not try to mislead the public to think that they were proven not to be real women?
Did you not conflate and misleadingly report about the texts between Jackie and Ryan from the night that she was sexually assaulted?
Why is Rolling Stone doing all of the apologizing? Have the lawyers for Rolling Stone read all of the documents? Why aren't they trying to have the Phi Kappa Psi case dismissed?
Why was the University of Virginia's swim coach asked to leave the school soon after Jackie first spoke to Ms. Eramo?
Copyright L. Kochman, April 15, 2017 @ 1:35 a.m.
