They know that the voyeurism in my apartment is not a false accusation.
They watched and heard the police investigate the apartment for the cameras and fail to find them, months ago.
They have visual and auditory proof that the police have no protocol or technology for investigating this crime, and also that the police don't care that I'm the victim of this crime; those media sources have the audio/videotape of the police searching the apartment for cameras for a few minutes and then talking to me as if I'm stupid, filmed from the hidden cameras that the police failed to find.
That audio/videotape also has one of the police officers telling me that he doesn't think that anyone makes electronic hidden camera detectors. The failure of the police to investigate or care about this crime is what caused me to continue to be the defendant for this case in court instead of the plaintiff, even though I am the injured person. I am the victim of this crime.
I have not talked to the police department again about the voyeurism, even though the camera detector that I finally bought online clearly reads that there are hidden cameras everywhere in the apartment. I am wary of trying to talk to anyone at the police station to say "the officer and the detective who investigated this case failed." I don't think that my walking into the police station by myself is going to result in anything other than my being told that the police have already done all that they can do. The police have already proven that they don't care.
Today, I went to another agency that is supposed to help people with legal advocacy for housing. I was told that if I can obtain proof that the cameras are in the apartment, the agency's legal department can consider how to reverse the agreement that I had to sign in court on April 3rd and that said that I would leave the apartment by May 31st. My request that a lawyer from that agency call the police department and ask the police to conduct another investigation was denied; I was told "You need proof." I said "I know that I need proof; that's why I need the police to really investigate." "I'm sorry, there's nothing we can do."
What I said to that was "You're not sorry, and it's not enough. What does a woman have to do?"
The police ought to be able to conduct this type of investigation, and to find evidence. The burden of proof should not be attributed to me over and over, when I am the victim of the crime and I'm asking the police to investigate it.
Voyeurism is everywhere; it's not being addressed because most of the victims are women, or not wealthy, or both, and because the conglomerate has promoted this crime instead of condemning it. The conglomerate thinks it's funny and that I deserve it, and the conglomerate doesn't care how many other people have been victimized by the voyeurism for which the conglomerate has told the public to target me.
I don't choose the addresses of videos that are published at YouTube.
Copyright L. Kochman, April 15, 2017 @ 1:10 a.m.
